Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Jun;19(S3):S67-S72.
doi: 10.1089/dia.2017.0012.

Future of Automated Insulin Delivery Systems

Affiliations
Review

Future of Automated Insulin Delivery Systems

Jessica R Castle et al. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017 Jun.

Abstract

Advances in continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) have brought on a paradigm shift in the management of type 1 diabetes. These advances have enabled the automation of insulin delivery, where an algorithm determines the insulin delivery rate in response to the CGM values. There are multiple automated insulin delivery (AID) systems in development. A system that automates basal insulin delivery has already received Food and Drug Administration approval, and more systems are likely to follow. As the field of AID matures, future systems may incorporate additional hormones and/or multiple inputs, such as activity level. All AID systems are impacted by CGM accuracy and future CGM devices must be shown to be sufficiently accurate to be safely incorporated into AID. In this article, we summarize recent achievements in AID development, with a special emphasis on CGM sensor performance, and discuss the future of AID systems from the point of view of their input-output characteristics, form factor, and adaptability.

Keywords: Artificial pancreas; Continuous glucose monitoring; Type 1 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

J.R.C. has a financial interest in Pacific Diabetes Technologies Inc, a company that may have a commercial interest in the results of this type of research and technology. In addition, J.R.C. reports research support from Dexcom and Tandem Diabetes Care outside the submitted work. The time for J.R.C. to prepare this article was supported by grant 1DP3DK101044-01 from NIH/NIDDK. This potential conflict of interest has been reviewed and managed by OHSU. J.H.D.V. reports personal fees from Roche and research support from Abbott, Dexcom, Medtronic, Sanofi, and Senseonics. B.K. reports grants from Sanofi-Aventis, personal fees from Dexcom and Sanofi-Aventis; support from Dexcom, Roche Diagnostics Inc., and Tandem Diabetes Care outside the submitted work. In addition, B.K. has patent # 8,562,587, October 22, 2013, with royalties paid to Animas Corporation, and is Board member and shareholder in TypeZero Technologies.

Figures

<b>FIG. 1.</b>
FIG. 1.
There exists a curvilinear relationship between MARD and the frequency of large deviations (>20%). Analyses of CGM accuracy data done by multiple studies show that this curve holds for a variety of sensors and is invariant across sensor manufacturers. Extensive in silico studies indicate that, within the rectangular area defined by MARD <10% and large deviations <12%, further improvement in sensor accuracy does not contribute substantively to better glycemic outcomes. Thus, a sensor with accuracy within this rectangular area can be used as replacement for blood glucose meters. The sensors depicted in the figure include: (1) Medtronic Paradigm with Enlite sensor; (2) Medtronic Paradigm with Enlite sensor; (3) Animas Vibe with Dexcom G4 version A; (4) Freestyle Navigator I; (5) Freestyle Navigator II; (6) Dexcom G4 Platinum; (7) Dexcom G4 Platinum; (8) Dexcom G5 with software 505. CGM, continuous glucose monitoring; MARD, mean absolute relative difference.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ruan Y, Thabit H, Leelarathna L, et al. : Variability of insulin requirements over 12 weeks of closed-loop insulin delivery in adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2016;39:830–832 - PubMed
    1. Hovorka R: Continuous glucose monitoring and closed-loop systems. Diabet Med 2006;23:1–12 - PubMed
    1. Steil GM, Panteleon AE, Rebrin K: Closed-loop insulin delivery-the path to physiological glucose control. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2004;56:125–144 - PubMed
    1. Cobelli C, Man CD, Sparacino G, et al. : Diabetes: models, signals, and control. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng 2009;2:54–96 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Doyle FJ, 3rd, Huyett LM, Lee JB, et al. : Closed-loop artificial pancreas systems: engineering the algorithms. Diabetes Care 2014;37:1191–1197 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms