Occlusal Outcome Of Non-Extraction And All First Premolars Extraction Treatment In Patients With Class-I Malocclusion
- PMID: 28586611
Occlusal Outcome Of Non-Extraction And All First Premolars Extraction Treatment In Patients With Class-I Malocclusion
Abstract
Background: Class-1 malocclusion commonly presents with crowding and poses an aesthetic concern to patients. An orthodontist may encounter a variety of dental problems and must handle them strategically to establish adequate occlusal relationships. Hence, this study was conducted to evaluate the occlusal characteristics of patients who have undergone non-extraction or all first premolars extraction treatment for class I malocclusion using the peer assessment rating (PAR) index.
Methods: The pre-treatment and post treatment dental casts of 94 subjects with class-I malocclusion were retrospectively screened. The sample was distributed into two groups, i.e., nonextraction and all first premolars extraction groups. The Mann Whitney-U test was used to compare the mean percentage improvement in the PAR scores between the two groups. A p-value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: The mean percentage improvement in the non-extraction group was 74.28% in the non-extraction group and 74.5% in the all first premolars extraction group. A significant difference (p=0.04) was found between the pretreatment PAR scores for the two treatment modalities. There was no significant difference between the post treatment PAR scores (p=0.45) and the mean percentage improvement in PAR scores (p=0.41) between the treatment groups.
Conclusions: The improvement in occlusal characteristics in patients who underwent non-extraction treatment and all first premolar extraction treatment was comparable as assessed through mean percentage improvement in PAR scores.
Keywords: Angle class I; Index; Malocclusion; Occlusion.
Similar articles
-
Improvement in Peer Assessment Rating scores after nonextraction, premolar extraction, and mandibular incisor extraction treatments in patients with Class I malocclusion.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017 Apr;151(4):685-690. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.09.016. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017. PMID: 28364891
-
Class II treatment efficiency in maxillary premolar extraction and nonextraction protocols.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Oct;132(4):490-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.10.031. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007. PMID: 17920502
-
Comparison of the outcomes of the lower incisor extraction, premolar extraction and non-extraction treatments.Eur J Orthod. 2012 Dec;34(6):681-5. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjr064. Epub 2011 Jul 10. Eur J Orthod. 2012. PMID: 21745824
-
Influence of the quality of the finished occlusion on postretention occlusal relapse.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Oct;132(4):428.e9-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.02.051. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007. PMID: 17920494
-
[Quality of finishing occlusion and long-term stability of orthodontic treatments with premolar extractions : A systematic review].Orthod Fr. 2020 Oct 1;91(3):191-195. doi: 10.1684/orthodfr.2020.21. Orthod Fr. 2020. PMID: 33146614 French.
Cited by
-
Pretreatment dentoskeletal comparison between individuals treated with extractions in the 1970s and in the new millennium.Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Apr;25(4):1997-2005. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03508-w. Epub 2020 Aug 11. Clin Oral Investig. 2021. PMID: 32780295
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources