Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Jun 6;7(5):e014087.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014087.

Finnish Subacromial Impingement Arthroscopy Controlled Trial (FIMPACT): a protocol for a randomised trial comparing arthroscopic subacromial decompression and diagnostic arthroscopy (placebo control), with an exercise therapy control, in the treatment of shoulder impingement syndrome

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Finnish Subacromial Impingement Arthroscopy Controlled Trial (FIMPACT): a protocol for a randomised trial comparing arthroscopic subacromial decompression and diagnostic arthroscopy (placebo control), with an exercise therapy control, in the treatment of shoulder impingement syndrome

Mika Paavola et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Arthroscopic subacromial decompression (ASD) is the most commonly performed surgical intervention for shoulder pain, yet evidence on its efficacy is limited. The rationale for the surgery rests on the tenet that symptom relief is achieved through decompression of the rotator cuff tendon passage. The primary objective of this superiority trial is to compare the efficacy of ASD versus diagnostic arthroscopy (DA) in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome (SIS), where DA differs only by the lack of subacromial decompression. A third group of supervised progressive exercise therapy (ET) will allow for pragmatic assessment of the relative benefits of surgical versus non-operative treatment strategies.

Methods and analysis: Finnish Subacromial Impingement Arthroscopy Controlled Trial is an ongoing multicentre, three-group randomised controlled study. We performed two-fold concealed allocation, first by randomising patients to surgical (ASD or DA) or conservative (ET) treatment in 2:1 ratio and then those allocated to surgery further to ASD or DA in 1:1 ratio. Our two primary outcomes are pain at rest and at arm activity, assessed using visual analogue scale (VAS). We will quantify the treatment effect as the difference between the groups in the change in the VAS scales with the associated 95% CI at 24 months. Our secondary outcomes are functional assessment (Constant score and Simple shoulder test), quality of life (15D and SF-36), patient satisfaction, proportions of responders and non-responders, reoperations/treatment conversions, all at 2 years post-randomisation, as well as adverse effects and complications. We recruited a total of 210 patients from three tertiary referral centres. We will conduct the primary analysis on the intention-to-treat basis.

Ethics and dissemination: The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Pirkanmaa Hospital District and duly registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. The findings of this study will be disseminated widely through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.

Trial registration number: NCT00428870; Pre-results.

Keywords: Acromion; Acromioplasty; Arthroscopy; Impingement; Physiotherapy; Placebo; Randomised; Sham; Shoulder; Syndrome; Trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: ST reports personal fees from Evalua group of companies, personal fees from DBC group of companies, and personal fees from insurance companies, outside the submitted work.KK reports an honorarium for a lecture from Linvatec, outside the submitted work. TLNJ reports an honorarium for a lecture on osteoporosis from AMGEN (donated to AllTrials campaign). Authors not named here have disclosed no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of the trial: enrolment, assigned intervention and follow-up scheme. MRA, MRI with intra-articular contrast; RC, rotator cuff.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Study design and interpretation of results. ASD, arthroscopic subacromial decompression; DA, diagnostic arthroscopy; ET, exercise therapy; SIS, subacromial impingement syndrome.

References

    1. Paloneva J, Lepola V, Karppinen J, et al. . Declining incidence of acromioplasty in Finland. Acta Orthop 2015;86:220–4. 10.3109/17453674.2014.977703 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vitale MA, Arons RR, Hurwitz S, et al. . The rising incidence of acromioplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010;92:1842–50. 10.2106/JBJS.I.01003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Engebretsen K, Grotle M, Bautz-Holter E, et al. . Radial extracorporeal shockwave treatment compared with supervised exercises in patients with subacromial pain syndrome: single blind randomised study. BMJ 2009;339:b3360 10.1136/bmj.b3360 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Diercks R, Bron C, Dorrestijn O, et al. . Dutch Orthopaedic Association. Guideline for diagnosis and treatment of subacromial pain syndrome: a multidisciplinary review by the Dutch Orthopaedic Association. Acta Orthop 2014;85:314–22. 10.3109/17453674.2014.920991 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Oh LS, Wolf BR, Hall MP, et al. . Indications for rotator cuff repair: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007;455:52–63. 10.1097/BLO.0b013e31802fc175 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources