Clinicians' perspectives of parental decision-making following diagnosis of a severe congenital anomaly: a qualitative study
- PMID: 28588110
- PMCID: PMC5729983
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014716
Clinicians' perspectives of parental decision-making following diagnosis of a severe congenital anomaly: a qualitative study
Abstract
Objective: To explore clinicians' perspectives on supporting parents' decision-making following diagnosis of a severe congenital anomaly, and how this is shaped by current policy.
Methods: This paper reports data collated as part of a larger project examining parents' decision-making following antenatal diagnosis. The focus of this paper is the data arising from semistructured interviews conducted with 18 clinicians, with findings further supported by data generated from consultations between clinicians and parents. All interviews and consultations were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim, with analysis based on the constant comparative approach.
Results: Three key themes emerged which together shape the practice of clinicians working in this area: first, the law governing termination of pregnancy (TOP) and how clinicians believe this influences the context in which decisions about whether to terminate or continue an affected pregnancy are made; second, approaches to the management of cases seen as particularly challenging; and third, how clinicians understand their role when working with parents. These themes combine to create a strong desire on the part of clinicians for parents to engage in a particular 'rational' form of decision-making and to be able to demonstrate the enactment of this. This is seen as important in order to ensure the 'right' decision has been reached and, particularly when the decision is to terminate, will withstand possible scrutiny.
Conclusions: The policy context in which these decisions are made strongly shapes how clinicians practise and what they want to see from the parents with whom they work. The ways in which they seek to overcome the difficulties in interpreting the law may result in variations in the offer of late TOP, both between and within units. This may inadvertently affect the options available to women least able to engage in this idealised form of decision-making.
Keywords: Antenatal; Clinicians; Congenital anomaly; Decision-making; Policy; Qualitative.
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Similar articles
-
Diagnosis of a severe congenital anomaly: A qualitative analysis of parental decision making and the implications for healthcare encounters.Health Expect. 2018 Jun;21(3):678-684. doi: 10.1111/hex.12664. Epub 2018 Feb 2. Health Expect. 2018. PMID: 29392858 Free PMC article.
-
Care provision during termination of pregnancy following diagnosis of a severe congenital anomaly - A qualitative study of what is important to parents.Midwifery. 2016 Dec;43:14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.10.003. Epub 2016 Oct 10. Midwifery. 2016. PMID: 27825056
-
Parents' decision-making following diagnosis of a severe congenital anomaly in pregnancy: Practical, theoretical and ethical tensions.Soc Sci Med. 2020 Dec;266:113362. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113362. Epub 2020 Sep 13. Soc Sci Med. 2020. PMID: 32957025
-
Parental decision-making following a prenatal diagnosis that is lethal, life-limiting, or has long term implications for the future child and family: a meta-synthesis of qualitative literature.BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Aug 8;20(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0393-7. BMC Med Ethics. 2019. PMID: 31395047 Free PMC article.
-
Prenatal diagnosis: choices women make about pursuing testing and acting on abnormal results.Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Sep;36(3):496-509. doi: 10.1097/00003081-199309000-00008. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1993. PMID: 8403601 Review.
Cited by
-
Life-limiting fetal conditions and pregnancy continuation: parental decision-making processes.BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2021 May 18:bmjspcare-2020-002857. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002857. Online ahead of print. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2021. PMID: 34006514 Free PMC article.
-
Patient Satisfaction after Antenatal Joint Fetal Medicine and Pediatric Surgery Counseling.J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2020 Nov-Dec;25(6):357-362. doi: 10.4103/jiaps.JIAPS_154_19. Epub 2020 Oct 27. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2020. PMID: 33487937 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnosis of a severe congenital anomaly: A qualitative analysis of parental decision making and the implications for healthcare encounters.Health Expect. 2018 Jun;21(3):678-684. doi: 10.1111/hex.12664. Epub 2018 Feb 2. Health Expect. 2018. PMID: 29392858 Free PMC article.
-
Perceived Impact of Healthcare Relationships and Interactions on Parental Experiences of Prenatal Diagnosis and Termination of Pregnancy for Foetal Anomaly on the Island of Ireland.Health Expect. 2024 Oct;27(5):e70068. doi: 10.1111/hex.70068. Health Expect. 2024. PMID: 39428704 Free PMC article.
-
Retrospective analysis of the indications, methods, and complications of pregnancy termination.Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Dec 12;21(4):273-279. doi: 10.4274/tjod.galenos.2024.88886. Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2024. PMID: 39663786 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Fetal anomaly screening programme - remit, aims and objectives (Internet). 2009. http://fetalanomaly.screening.nhs.uk/fetalanomalyresource/images/stories... (accessed 09 May 2015).
-
- Fetal anomaly screening standards (Internet). 2010. http://fetalanomaly.screening.nhs.uk/standards (accessed 10/2015).
-
- Department of Health. Abortion statistics in England and Wales (Internet). 2015. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/fil... (accessed 06/2016).
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical