Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 May 23:11:24.
doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2017.00024. eCollection 2017.

A Human-Robot Interaction Perspective on Assistive and Rehabilitation Robotics

Affiliations

A Human-Robot Interaction Perspective on Assistive and Rehabilitation Robotics

Philipp Beckerle et al. Front Neurorobot. .

Abstract

Assistive and rehabilitation devices are a promising and challenging field of recent robotics research. Motivated by societal needs such as aging populations, such devices can support motor functionality and subject training. The design, control, sensing, and assessment of the devices become more sophisticated due to a human in the loop. This paper gives a human-robot interaction perspective on current issues and opportunities in the field. On the topic of control and machine learning, approaches that support but do not distract subjects are reviewed. Options to provide sensory user feedback that are currently missing from robotic devices are outlined. Parallels between device acceptance and affective computing are made. Furthermore, requirements for functional assessment protocols that relate to real-world tasks are discussed. In all topic areas, the design of human-oriented frameworks and methods is dominated by challenges related to the close interaction between the human and robotic device. This paper discusses the aforementioned aspects in order to open up new perspectives for future robotic solutions.

Keywords: affective computing; assistive and rehabilitation robotics; functional assessment; human-oriented design; human–robot interaction; learning and control; sensory feedback.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Anghinolfi D., Cannata G., Mastrogiovanni F., Nattero C., Paolucci M. (2013). On the problem of the automated design of large-scale robot skin. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 10, 1087–1100.10.1109/TASE.2013.2252617 - DOI
    1. Argall B. D. (2014). “Modular and adaptive wheelchair automation,” in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Experimental Robotics (ISER), Marrakech.
    1. Argall B. D. (2015). “Turning assistive machines into assistive robots,” in Proceedings of the SPIE Photonics West Congress (San Francisco: Keynote).
    1. Au S. K., Weber J., Herr H. (2009). Powered ankle-foot prosthesis improves walking metabolic economy. IEEE Trans. Robot. 25, 51–66.10.1109/TRO.2008.2008747 - DOI
    1. Beckerle P. (2014). Human-Machine-Centered Design and Actuation of Lower Limb Prosthetic Systems. Aachen: Shaker Verlag.

LinkOut - more resources