Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 May 23:8:64.
doi: 10.3389/fgene.2017.00064. eCollection 2017.

Metabolic and Genetic Markers of Biological Age

Affiliations

Metabolic and Genetic Markers of Biological Age

S Michal Jazwinski et al. Front Genet. .

Abstract

Biological age is a concept that takes into account the heterogeneity of the aging process in different individuals that results in differences in survival and variations in relative health. Any measure of biological age must be better than chronological age at predicting mortality. Several quantitative measures of biological age have been developed. Among them are frailty indices, one of which called FI34 is discussed here in greater detail. FI34 increases exponentially with age reflecting decline in health and function ability. It readily depicts different patterns and trajectories of aging, and it is moderately heritable. Thus, it has been used to identify a genomic region on chromosome 12 associated with healthy aging. FI34 has also been useful in describing the metabolic characteristics of this phenotype, revealing both sex and genetic differences. These differences give rise to specific, testable models regarding healthy aging, which involve cell and tissue damage and mitochondrial metabolism. FI34 has been directly compared to various metrics based on DNA methylation as a predictor of mortality, demonstrating that it outperforms them uniformly. This and other frailty indices take a top-down, systems based view of aging that is cognizant of the integrated function of the complex aging system.

Keywords: DNA methylation; energy metabolism; frailty index; genes; healthy aging.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Body composition and creatine kinase levels are associated with FI34 in females and males, respectively. (A) Female and (B) male nonagenarians were compared. FI34 is the outcome variable presented as a standardized coefficient in multiple linear regressions. The explanatory variables are CK, FFM, FM, and RMR. The sample size (N) and the coefficient of determination (R2) with p-value are shown. p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001, for the standardized coefficients for each variable. Based on data from Kim et al. (2014).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Comparison of effect sizes for hazards of death. Cox proportional hazards regressions were applied to the survival data of 262 subjects ages 60–103 and are presented as Z scores. Age, FI34, DNA methylation age (DNAm Age), Age Acceleration Difference (Age Diff), and Age Acceleration Residual (Age Resid) are the covariates. (A) All subjects, (B) nonagenarians (N = 161). p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001. This figure has been adapted from Kim et al. (2017) under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Belsky D. W., Caspi A., Houts R., Cohen H. J., Corcoran D. L., Danese A., et al. (2015). Quantification of biological aging in young adults. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112 E4104–E4110. 10.1073/pnas.1506264112 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen B. H., Marioni R. E., Colicino E., Peters M. J., Ward-Caviness C. K., Tsai P. C., et al. (2016). DNA methylation-based measures of biological age: meta-analysis predicting time to death. Aging (Albany NY) 8 1844–1865. 10.18632/aging.101020 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Christiansen L., Lenart A., Tan Q., Vaupel J. W., Aviv A., McGue M., et al. (2016). DNA methylation age is associated with mortality in a longitudinal Danish twin study. Aging Cell 15 149–154. 10.1111/acel.12421 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dato S., Montesanto A., Lagani V., Jeune B., Christensen K., Passarino G. (2012). Frailty phenotypes in the elderly based on cluster analysis: a longitudinal study of two Danish cohorts. Evidence for a genetic influence on frailty. Age (Dordr) 34 571–582. 10.1007/s11357-011-9257-x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Evert J., Lawler E., Bogan H., Perls T. (2003). Morbidity profiles of centenarians: survivors, delayers, and escapers. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 58 232–237. - PubMed