Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jun;13(6):4633-4640.
doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.6068. Epub 2017 Apr 21.

Palliative treatment of patients with inoperable locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell cancer, using a low-dose and personalized chemotherapeutic regimen

Affiliations

Palliative treatment of patients with inoperable locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell cancer, using a low-dose and personalized chemotherapeutic regimen

Rohit Bishnoi et al. Oncol Lett. 2017 Jun.

Abstract

Inoperable or metastatic head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) is known to be associated with a poor patient prognosis. First line therapies include a Taxol, platinum-based antineoplastic and fluorouracil (FU) treatment regimen (TPF) or a platinum-based antineoplastic, FU and EGFR inhibitor treatment regimen (PFE). The toxicity of these regimens is one of the major limiting factors, particularly for palliative treatment. The present study is a retrospective study of 15 patients with HNSCC, where the treatment goal was palliative. Of the 15 patients, 8 received a TPF, while 7 received a PFE. A total of 129 treatment cycles were administered with a median of 9 cycles (range, 3-14). Chemotherapy began with low doses and was subsequently titrated up based on tolerance and response. Positive responses were noted with the lower doses compared with the conventional doses, and maximal doses were not required. The median dose of cisplatin, paclitaxel and 5-FU administered was 40 mg/m2, 80 mg/m2 and 360 mg/m2/day for 5 days, respectively. Cetuximab was used at a standard dose. At the initial follow-up (mean, 64 days; 3 cycles), a 100% disease control rate (DCR) and 80% overall response rate (ORR) was achieved. A positive response, 60% DCR and 60% ORR, was maintained until the late stages of the study (mean, 217 days; 9 cycles). Following termination of chemotherapy after >9 cycles, 4 patients remained disease free for ~1 year. A total of 3 patients exhibited a pathologic complete response despite radiologically exhibiting residual disease. The median progression-free survival time was 10.03 months and the overall survival time was 15.77 months. The only grade 3 hematologic toxicity noted was neutropenia in 3 (20%) patients. Grade 3 vomiting was noted in 1 (6.67%) patient and grade 3 stomatitis was noted in 1 (6.67%) patient. Due to low toxicity patients exhibited improved tolerance to this approach, particularly in terms of palliative care. Furthermore, these results are in contrast to the axiom that increased doses are more effective.

Keywords: low-dose chemotherapy; palliative chemotherapy; patient customized chemotherapy; recurrent HNSCC.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Average tumor volume decreased during the course of therapy. Average tumor volume was quantified using computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, and normalized to the tumor volume measured on the first day of treatment.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Comparison of patient progression-free survival rates in previously published clinical with those in the present study. The present study using decreased doses of drugs led to equivalent or increased survival rates. The progression-free survival rate at 35, 15, and 28 months was ~20.0, 8.0 and 0.0% for the TAX323 (9), EXTREME (12), and SPECTRUM (14) trials, respectively, compared with ~40% in the present study.

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66:7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21332. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Digonnet A, Hamoir M, Andry G, Haigentz M, Jr, Takes RP, Silver CE, Hartl DM, Strojan P, Rinaldo A, de Bree R, et al. Post-therapeutic surveillance strategies in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;270:1569. doi: 10.1007/s00405-012-2172-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sanderson RJ, Ironside JAD. Squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. BMJ. 2002;325:822–827. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7368.822. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pulte D, Brenner H. Changes in survival in head and neck cancers in the Late 20th and early 21st century: A period analysis. Oncologist. 2010;15:994–1001. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2009-0289. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Molin Y, Fayette J. Current chemotherapies for recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer. Anticancer Drugs. 2011;22:621–625. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0b013e3283421f7c. - DOI - PubMed