Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Aug;37(4):419-428.
doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000000721.

Ethanol Interactions With Dexmethylphenidate and dl-Methylphenidate Spheroidal Oral Drug Absorption Systems in Healthy Volunteers

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Ethanol Interactions With Dexmethylphenidate and dl-Methylphenidate Spheroidal Oral Drug Absorption Systems in Healthy Volunteers

Hao-Jie Zhu et al. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2017 Aug.

Abstract

Background/purpose: Ethanol coadministered with immediate-release dl-methylphenidate (dl-MPH) or dexmethylphenidate (d-MPH) significantly increases the geomean maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of d-MPH 22% and 15%, respectively, and elevates overall drug exposure and psychostimulant effects. We asked the question: Are these ethanol-MPH interactions based more fundamentally on (1) inhibition of postabsorption d-MPH metabolism or (2) acceleration of MPH formulation gastric dissolution by ethanol in the stomach? This was investigated using the pulsatile, distinctly biphasic, spheroidal oral drug absorption systems of dl-MPH and d-MPH.

Methods: In a randomized, 4-way crossover study, 14 healthy subjects received pulsatile dl-MPH (40 mg) or d-MPH (20 mg), with or without ethanol (0.6 g/kg), dosed 4 hours later. These 4 hours allowed the delayed-release second MPH pulse to reach a more distal region of the gut to preclude gastric biopharmaceutical influences. Plasma was analyzed using a highly sensitive chiral method. Subjective/physiological effects were recorded.

Findings/results: Ethanol increased the second pulse of d-MPH Cmax for dl-MPH by 35% (P < 0.01) and the partial area under the plasma concentration curve from 4 to 8 hours by 25% (P < 0.05). The respective values for enantiopure d-MPH were 27% (P = 0.001) and 20% (P < 0.01). The carboxylesterase 1-mediated transesterification metabolite ethylphenidate served as a biomarker for coexposure. Ethanol significantly potentiated stimulant responses to either formulation.

Implications/conclusions: These findings support drug dispositional interactions between ethanol and MPH as dominant over potential biopharmaceutical considerations. Understanding the pharmacology underlying the frequent coabuse of MPH-ethanol provides rational guidance in the selection of first-line pharmacotherapy for comorbid attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder-alcohol use disorder.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
(Top): Arithmetic mean (+/− SD) d-MPH plasma concentrations after dosing with MR-dl-MPH (40 mg) alone (□) or dosing with racemic MR-dl-MPH (40 mg MR) followed by ethanol (0.6 g/kg) 4–4.25 h later (▪); (Bottom): Arithmetic mean d-MPH plasma concentrations after dosing with enantiopure MR-d-MPH (20 mg) alone (Δ) or dosing with MR-d-MPH (20 mg) followed by ethanol (0.6 g/kg;) 4–4.25 h later. Values only include those at or above the lower limit of detection (≥ 0.025 ng/ml).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Visual analog subscale positive subjective drug effects of “Stimulated; “High”; “Good”; and “Any effect” (0 – 12.5 hours): Racemic MR-dl-MPH (40 mg) was administered alone (□) or followed by ethanol (0.6 g/kg) 4–4.25 hours later (▪). Enantiopure MR-d-MPH (20 mg) was administered alone (Δ) or followed by ethanol (0.6 g/kg) 4–4.25 hours later (■). MPH administration was at T = 0 hours. Effect ratings were from 0 = “Not at all” to 100 = “Extremely”; Values represent the arithmetic mean (+/− SD); *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; aP = 0.071; bP = 0.078.

References

    1. Levin FR, Kleber HD. Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and substance abuse: relationships and implications for treatment. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 1995;2:246–58. - PubMed
    1. Barrett SP, Pihl RO. Oral methylphenidate-alcohol co-abuse. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2002;22:33–34. - PubMed
    1. Teter CJ, McCabe SE, Boyd CJ, et al. Illicit methylphenidate use in an undergraduate student sample: prevalence and risk factors. Pharmacotherapy. 2003;23:609–17. - PubMed
    1. Barrett SP, Darredeau C, Bordy LE, et al. Characteristics of methylphenidate misuse in a university student sample. Can J Psychiatry. 2005;50:457–61. - PubMed
    1. Barrett SP, Darredeau C, Pihl RO. Patterns of simultaneous polysubstance use in drug using university students. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2006;21:255–263. - PubMed

Publication types