Surgical Management of a Persistent Stapedial Artery: A Review
- PMID: 28590999
- PMCID: PMC5470859
- DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001466
Surgical Management of a Persistent Stapedial Artery: A Review
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the outcome and per- and postoperative complications of the surgical management of patients with a persistent stapedial artery (PSA).
Methods: A systemic literature search for reports on patients treated for pulsatile tinnitus and/or conductive hearing loss caused by a PSA was conducted of the PubMed and Embase databases using the terms "stapedial" and "artery." Inclusion criteria were adequate description of the intervention and pre- and postoperative signs and symptoms. In addition, one case of a PSA, treated at VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands, was included in this series.
Intervention: Middle ear surgery consisting of stapedotomy or stapedectomy, and/or transection of the PSA.
Main outcome measures: Pre- and postoperative hearing levels, pre- and postoperative pulsatile tinnitus, and per- and postoperative complications.
Results: Seventeen patients and 18 operated ears were evaluated (16 patients described in 14 articles and our case). Twelve out of 14 ears in which a stapedotomy or stapedectomy was initiated experienced improvement in hearing. In four cases pulsatile tinnitus was described pre- and postoperatively. In all four, pulsatile tinnitus subsided after transection of the PSA. Peroperative bleeding from the PSA was described in four patients, which could be controlled during the procedure. No significant postoperative sequelae were reported.
Conclusions: In case of a PSA, improvement of conductive hearing loss is best achieved by stapes surgery, while pulsatile tinnitus is effectively treated with transection of the PSA. To date no long-term postoperative complications have been reported.
Comment in
-
Breaking the Myth of Central Neurological Complications in Stapedial Artery Surgery.Otol Neurotol. 2018 Mar;39(3):387-388. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001722. Otol Neurotol. 2018. PMID: 29424821 No abstract available.
-
Response to "Breaking the Myth of Central Neurological Complications in Stapedial Artery Surgery".Otol Neurotol. 2018 Mar;39(3):388. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001723. Otol Neurotol. 2018. PMID: 29424822 No abstract available.
References
-
- Hogg ID, Stephens CB, Arnold GE. Theoretical anomalies of the stapedial artery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1972; 81:860–870. - PubMed
-
- Moreano EH, Paparella MM, Zelterman D, et al. Prevalence of facial canal dehiscence and of persistent stapedial artery in the human middle ear: A report of 1000 temporal bones. Laryngoscope 1994; 104:309–320. - PubMed
-
- Govaerts PJ, Marquet TF, Cremers WR, et al. Persistent stapedial artery: does it prevent successful surgery? Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1993; 102:724–728. - PubMed
-
- Hitier M, Zhang M, Labrousse M, et al. Persistent stapedial arteries in human: from phylogeny to surgical consequences. Surg Radiol Anat 2013; 35:883–891. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Molecular Biology Databases
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
