Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jul 25;8(30):49689-49701.
doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.17917.

Clinical evaluation of integrated panel testing by next-generation sequencing for somatic mutations in neuroblastomas with MYCN unamplification

Affiliations

Clinical evaluation of integrated panel testing by next-generation sequencing for somatic mutations in neuroblastomas with MYCN unamplification

Yanna Cao et al. Oncotarget. .

Abstract

Neuroblastomas (NBs) exhibit heterogeneity and show clinically significant prognosis classified by genetic alterations. Among prognostic genes or genome factors, MYCN amplification (MNA) is the most established genomic marker of poor prognosis in patients with NB. However, the prognostic classification of more than 60% of patients without MNA has yet to be clarified. In this study, the application of target next-generation sequencing (NGS) was extended on the basis of a comprehensive panel of regions where copy number variations (CNVs) or point mutations occurred to improve the prognostic evaluation of these patients and obtain the sequence of 33 patients without MNA. A mean coverage depth of 887× was determined in the target regions in all of the samples, and the mapped read percentage was more than 99%. Somatic mutations in patients without MNA could be precisely defined on the basis of these findings, and 17 unique somatic aberrations, including 14 genes, were identified in 11 patients. Among these variations, most were CNVs with a number of 13. The 3-year event-free survival (EFS) of CNV(-) patients was 60.0% compared with the EFS (16.7%) of CNV(+) patients (P = 0.015, HR = 0.1344, 95%, CI = 0.027 to 0.678). CNVs were also associated with unfavorable histological characteristics (P = 0.003) and likely to occur in stage 4 (P = 0.041). These results might further indicate the role of CNVs in NB chemotherapy resistance (P = 0.059) and show CNVs as a therapeutic target. In multivariate analysis, the presence of CNVs was a clinically negative prognostic marker that impaired the outcome of patients without MNA and associated with poor prognosis in this tumor subset. Comprehensive genetic/genomic profiling instead of focusing on single genetic marker should be performed through in-depth NGS that could reveal prognostic information, improve NB target therapy, and provide a basis for investigations on NB pathogenesis.

Keywords: DNA copy number variations; high-throughput nucleotide sequencing; neuroblastoma; prognosis; treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors declared no potential financial conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. 13 CNVs of 8 patients
(CN_amp: copy number amplification; CN_del: copy number deletion)
Figure 2
Figure 2. H&E staining of the patient with TIAM1 deletion
(A) HE 200 ×; (B) HE 400 ×
Figure 3
Figure 3. Four point mutations in four patients
(2 ALK: F1174L; BRCA2: K2392N; PHOX2B: F86fs)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Oncoprint outcome of 11 patients (detected somatic mutations were mostly CNVs, including CN amp and CN del)
CDK4, CCND1, and ALK variations appeared most frequently, and they were present in two patients)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Summary of three-year EFS rates and log-rank test comparisons by CNV outcome
Figure 6
Figure 6. Distribution of obtaining a VGPR after four cycles of chemotherapy between CNV(+) and CNV (−)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. London WB, Castleberry RP, Matthay KK, Look AT, Seeger RC, Shimada H, Thorner P, Brodeur G, Maris JM, Reynolds CP, Cohn SL. Evidence for an age cutoff greater than 365 days for neuroblastoma risk group stratification in the Children's Oncology Group. Journal of clinical oncology. 2005;23:6459–6465. - PubMed
    1. Matthay KK, George RE, Yu AL. Promising therapeutic targets in neuroblastoma. Clinical cancer research. 2012;18:2740–2753. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shimada H, Chatten J, Newton WA, Jr, Sachs N, Hamoudi AB, Chiba T, Marsden HB, Misugi K. Histopathologic prognostic factors in neuroblastic tumors: definition of subtypes of ganglioneuroblastoma and an age-linked classification of neuroblastomas. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1984;73:405–416. - PubMed
    1. Seeger RC, Brodeur GM, Sather H, Dalton A, Siegel SE, Wong KY, Hammond D. Association of multiple copies of the N-myc oncogene with rapid progression of neuroblastomas. The New England journal of medicine. 1985;313:1111–1116. - PubMed
    1. Shimada H, Ambros IM, Dehner LP, Hata J, Joshi VV, Roald B. Terminology and morphologic criteria of neuroblastic tumors: recommendations by the International Neuroblastoma Pathology Committee. Cancer. 1999;86:349–363. - PubMed

MeSH terms