Perceived barriers to effective implementation of public reporting of hospital performance data in Australia: a qualitative study
- PMID: 28592277
- PMCID: PMC5463349
- DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2336-7
Perceived barriers to effective implementation of public reporting of hospital performance data in Australia: a qualitative study
Abstract
Background: Public reporting of government funded (public) hospital performance data was mandated in Australia in 2011. Studies suggest some benefit associated with such public reporting, but also considerable scope to improve reporting systems.
Methods: In 2015, a purposive sample of 41 expert informants were interviewed, representing consumer, provider and purchasers perspectives across Australia's public and private health sectors, to ascertain expert opinion on the utility and impact of public reporting of health service performance. Qualitative data was thematically analysed with a focus on reporting perceived strengths and barriers to public reporting of hospital performance data (PR).
Results: Many more weaknesses and barriers to PR were identified than strengths. Barriers were: conceptual (unclear objective, audience and reporting framework); systems-level (including lack of consumer choice, lack of consumer and clinician involvement, jurisdictional barriers, lack of mandate for private sector reporting); technical and resource related (including data complexity, lack of data relevance consistency, rigour); and socio-cultural (including provider resistance to public reporting, poor consumer health literacy, lack of consumer empowerment).
Conclusions: Perceptions of the Australian experience of PR highlight important issues in its implementation that can provide lessons for Australia and elsewhere. A considerable weakness of PR in Australia is that the public are often not considered its major audience, resulting in information ineffectually framed to meet the objective of PR informing consumer decision-making about treatment options. Greater alignment is needed between the primary objective of PR, its audience and audience needs; more than one system of PR might be necessary to meet different audience needs and objectives. Further research is required to assess objectively the potency of the barriers to PR suggested by our panel of informants.
Keywords: Accountability; Australia; Consumer; Decision-making; Hospital performance; Public reporting; Qualitative data; Quality improvement.
References
-
- Hibbert P, Hannaford N, Long J, Plumb J, Braithwaite J. Final Report: Performance indicators used internationally to report publicly on healthcare organisations and local health systems. Australian Institute of Health Innovation, University of New South Wales. 2013.
-
- Gallagher MP, Krumholz HM. Public reporting of hospital outcomes: a challenging road ahead. Med J Aust. 2011;194:658–660. - PubMed
-
- Cacace M, Ettelt S, Brereton L, Pedersen J, Nolte E. How health systems make available information on service providers. Experience in seven countries. 2011:94. [http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/technical_reports/2011/RAND_TR...] Accessed 19 Aug 2016. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Rechel B, McKee M, Haas M, Marchildon GP, Bousquet F, Blümel M, Geissler A, van Ginneken E, Ashton T, Saunes IS, et al. Public reporting on quality, waiting times and patient experience in 11 high-income countries. Health Policy. 2016;120:377–383. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.02.008. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Kumpunen S, Trigg L, Rodrigues R. Public reporting in health and long-term care to facilitate provider choice. WHO European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. 2014:49:5–6.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials