Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Dec;31(12):5364-5371.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5617-7. Epub 2017 Jun 7.

A novel training device for tip control in colonoscopy: preliminary validation and efficacy as a training tool

Affiliations

A novel training device for tip control in colonoscopy: preliminary validation and efficacy as a training tool

Stephan Riek et al. Surg Endosc. 2017 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Effective control of the colonoscope tip is one of the most fundamental components of colonoscopy skill. Mastering fine tip control can be problematic for novice trainees, yet no validated training regimes exist for developing this specific skill component in isolation. We aimed to conduct a preliminary validation of a novel training device for colonoscopic tip control, and to assess its efficacy as a training tool.

Methods: In study 1 (validation), 13 experienced colonoscopists and 16 novices used a colonoscope to accurately track 28 targets on each of four concave "training surfaces" as quickly as possible, and we compared their performance. In study 2 (pre-post-training study), another 16 novices were tested before and after a six-session training program. In both studies, the main outcome measurements were completion time (measured automatically by the device) and variability of individual performance (the SD of each individual's completion times across trials).

Results: Compared with novices, experienced colonoscopists were faster (P < 0.0001) and their performances less variable (P < 0.0001). With training, novices became faster (P < 0.0001) and more consistent (P = 0.003), and these improvements also generalized to novel training surfaces (P's < 0.01). After training, the novices' tip control performance was indistinguishable from that of the experienced colonoscopists (P's > 0.05). The composite measures of completion time used in both studies all had acceptable to excellent internal consistency reliability (α's ranged from 0.72 to 0.93).

Conclusions: We found that performance measures derived from using the device to assess skill can discriminate between experienced colonoscopists and novices in terms of their ability to control and guide the colonoscope tip precisely, providing preliminary evidence to support the construct validity of the metrics. The device is also an effective training tool for this fundamental component of colonoscopy skill.

Keywords: Colonoscopy; Motor skill; Skill assessment; Tip control; Training.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Stephan Riek, Andrew Hill, Annaliese M. Plooy, Mark S. Horswill, Alanna St. G. Cresp, Welber Marinovic, Melany J. Christofidis, Robin Burgess-Limerick, Guy M. Wallis, Marcus O. Watson, and David G. Hewett have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The tip control training device: in close up, showing the base, a concave training surface, and the colonoscope clamp (A); and in use with a standard colonoscope and custom software (B)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Validation study results (study 1). Box plots showing mean completion time (A) and variability of individual performance across trials (B) for each experience group. The line inside each box represents the sample median, and the dot represents the mean. The boundaries of each box represent the 25th and 75th percentiles, and the whiskers represent the minimum and maximum values
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Training study results (study 2). Box plots showing mean completion time (A) and variability of individual performance across trials (B) for novices at pre-test, post-test, and transfer test. For comparison, equivalent data from the validation study experienced colonoscopist group are also included. The line inside each box represents the sample median, and the dot represents the mean. The boundaries of each box represent the 25th and 75th percentiles, and the whiskers represent the minimum and maximum values

References

    1. Raman M, Donnon T. Procedural skills education—colonoscopy as a model. Can J Gastroenterol. 2008;22(9):767–770. doi: 10.1155/2008/386851. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anderson JT. Teaching colonoscopy. In: Waye JD, Rex DK, Williams CB, editors. Colonoscopy: principles and practice. Malden: Blackwell; 2009. pp. 141–153.
    1. Zupanc CM, Burgess-Limerick R, Hill A, Riek S, Wallis GM, Plooy AM, Horswill MS, Watson MO, Hewett DG. A competency framework for colonoscopy training derived from cognitive task analysis techniques and expert review. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15:216. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0494-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cass OW. Objective evaluation of competence: technical skills in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopy. 1995;27(1):86–89. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1005640. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vargo JJ. North of 100 and south of 500: where does the “sweet spot” of colonoscopic competence lie? Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71(2):325–326. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.09.027. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources