Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jul/Aug;31(4):210-218.
doi: 10.1097/NUR.0000000000000308.

The Experiences of Specialist Nurses Working Within the Uro-oncology Multidisciplinary Team in the United Kingdom

Affiliations

The Experiences of Specialist Nurses Working Within the Uro-oncology Multidisciplinary Team in the United Kingdom

Geoffrey Punshon et al. Clin Nurse Spec. 2017 Jul/Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: United Kingdom prostate cancer nursing care is provided by a variety of urology and uro-oncology nurses. The experience of working in multidisciplinary teams (MDT) was investigated in a national study.

Design: The study consisted of a national survey with descriptive statistics and thematic analysis.

Methods: A secondary analysis of a data subset from a UK whole population survey was undertaken (n = 285) of the specialist nursing workforce and the services they provide. Data were collected on the experience of working in the MDT.

Results: Forty-five percent of the respondents felt that they worked in a functional MDT, 12% felt that they worked in a dysfunctional MDT, and 3.5% found the MDT meeting intimidating. Furthermore, 34% of the nurses felt that they could constructively challenge all members of the MDT in meetings. Themes emerging from open-ended questions were lack of interest in nonmedical concerns by other team members, ability to constructively challenge decisions or views within the meeting, and little opportunity for patients' wishes to be expressed.

Conclusions: Despite expertise and experience, nurses had a variable, often negative, experience of the MDT. It is necessary to ensure that all participants can contribute and are heard and valued. More emphasis should be given to patients' nonmedical needs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE.
FIGURE.
Agreed statements about MDT meeting (number indicates number of respondents out of 285 agreeing with the statement).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cancer Research United Kingdom. Prostate cancer statistics. http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/st.... Accessed October 21, 2016.
    1. Department of Health. National cancer patient experience survey programme. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-cancer-patient-exper.... Accessed October 9, 2014.
    1. Department of Health. National cancer patient experience survey. http://tinyurl.com/crpdaxx. Accessed October 9, 2014.
    1. National Health Service England. Cancer patient experience survey 2012–13. http://tinyurl.com/ntxeh52. Accessed October 23, 2014.
    1. NHS England. Cancer patient experience survey 2014. Web site. http://tinyurl.com/oz96j68. Accessed October 23, 2014.