Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2017 Jul;130(1):181-189.
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002090.

Clinical Validation of a Test for the Diagnosis of Vaginitis

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Clinical Validation of a Test for the Diagnosis of Vaginitis

Charlotte A Gaydos et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: Vaginitis may be diagnosed as bacterial vaginosis, vulvovaginal candidiasis, trichomoniasis, or coinfection. A new molecular test assays the vaginal microbiome and organisms that cause three common infections. The objective of the trial was to evaluate the clinical accuracy of the investigational test for vaginal swabs collected by patients (self) or clinicians. The primary and secondary outcomes were to compare the investigational test with reference methods for the three most common causes of vaginitis and compare clinician-collected with self-collected swabs.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study in which women with symptoms of vaginitis were recruited at ten clinical centers and consented to the investigation between May and September 2015. The woman collected a vaginal swab, sheathed, and then handed it to the clinician. These swabs were to evaluate how self-collected swabs compared with clinician-collected swabs. The clinician collected an investigational test swab and reference test swabs. From 1,740 symptomatic patients, clinician-collected and self-collected vaginal swabs were evaluated by the molecular test and six tests. The reference methods for bacterial vaginosis were Nugent's score and Amsel's criteria for intermediate Nugent results. The reference methods for Candida infection were isolation of any potential Candida microorganisms from inoculation of two culture media: chromogenic and Sabouraud agar and sequencing. The reference methods for trichomoniasis were wet mount and culture.

Results: For clinician-collected swabs, by reference methods, bacterial vaginosis was diagnosed in 56.5%, vaginal candidiasis in 32.8%, trichomoniasis in 8%, and none of the three infections in 24% with a coinfection rate of 20%. The investigational test sensitivity was 90.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 88.3-92.2%) and specificity was 85.8% (95% CI 83.0-88.3%) for bacterial vaginosis. The investigational test sensitivity was 90.9% (95% CI 88.1-93.1%) and specificity was 94.1% (95% CI 92.6-95.4%) for the Candida group. Sensitivity for Candida glabrata was 75.9% (95% CI 57.9-87.8%) and specificity was 99.7% (95% CI 99.3-99.9%). Investigational test sensitivity was 93.1% (95% CI 87.4-96.3%) and specificity was 99.3% (95% CI 98.7-99.6%) for trichomoniasis. Results from self-collected swabs were similar to clinician-collected swabs.

Conclusion: A molecular-based test using vaginal swabs collected by clinicians or patients can accurately diagnose most common bacterial, fungal, and protozoan causes of vaginitis. Women and their clinicians seeking accurate diagnosis and appropriate selection of efficacious treatment for symptoms of vaginitis might benefit from this molecular test.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Testing algorithm. Blue boxes indicate patient- or clinician-collected swabs, green boxes refer to specimen transport, and pink boxes refer to testing of the different methods. TV, trichomonas vaginalis; KOH, potassium hydroxide. Gaydos. Molecular Diagnosis of Vaginitis. Obstet Gynecol 2017.

Comment in

  • Clinical Validation of a Test for the Diagnosis of Vaginitis.
    Donders G, Baptista PV. Donders G, et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct;130(4):912. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002280. Obstet Gynecol. 2017. PMID: 28937557 No abstract available.
  • In Reply.
    Gaydos C, Coleman JS. Gaydos C, et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct;130(4):912-913. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002281. Obstet Gynecol. 2017. PMID: 28937558 No abstract available.

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually transmitted disease surveillance 2014. Atlanta (GA): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2015.
    1. Koumans EH, Sternberg M, Bruce C, McQuillan G, Kendrick J, Sutton M, et al. The prevalence of bacterial vaginosis in the United States, 2001–2004; associations with symptoms, sexual behaviors, and reproductive health. Sex Transm Dis. 2007;34:864–9. - PubMed
    1. Anderson MR, Klink K, Cohrssen A. Evaluation of vaginal complaints. JAMA. 2004;291:1368–79. - PubMed
    1. Taylor BD, Darville T, Haggerty CL. Does bacterial vaginosis cause pelvic inflammatory disease? Sex Transm Dis. 2013;40:117–22. - PubMed
    1. O’Hanlon DE, Moench TR, Cone RA. Vaginal pH and microbicidal lactic acid when lactobacilli dominate the microbiota. PLoS One. 2013;8:e80074. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms