Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jun 8;12(6):e0179272.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179272. eCollection 2017.

Estimating an area-level socioeconomic status index and its association with colonoscopy screening adherence

Affiliations

Estimating an area-level socioeconomic status index and its association with colonoscopy screening adherence

David C Wheeler et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Socioeconomic status (SES) is often considered a risk factor for health outcomes. SES is typically measured using individual variables of educational attainment, income, housing, and employment variables or a composite of these variables. Approaches to building the composite variable include using equal weights for each variable or estimating the weights with principal components analysis or factor analysis. However, these methods do not consider the relationship between the outcome and the SES variables when constructing the index. In this project, we used weighted quantile sum (WQS) regression to estimate an area-level SES index and its effect in a model of colonoscopy screening adherence in the Minnesota-Wisconsin Metropolitan Statistical Area. We considered several specifications of the SES index including using different spatial scales (e.g., census block group-level, tract-level) for the SES variables. We found a significant positive association (odds ratio = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.15-1.19) between the SES index and colonoscopy adherence in the best fitting model. The model with the best goodness-of-fit included a multi-scale SES index with 10 variables at the block group-level and one at the tract-level, with home ownership, race, and income among the most important variables. Contrary to previous index construction, our results were not consistent with an assumption of equal importance of variables in the SES index when explaining colonoscopy screening adherence. Our approach is applicable in any study where an SES index is considered as a variable in a regression model and the weights for the SES variables are not known in advance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Study area with census tracts that contain study patient residential locations in Minnesota and Wisconsin.
Fig 2
Fig 2. SES index for block groups estimated with block group model 1 (BG1) in the training set.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts & figures 2016. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2016.
    1. Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O'Brien MJ, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Van Ballegooijen M, Hankey BF, et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(8):687–96. 10.1056/NEJMoa1100370 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med.2008;149(9):627–37. - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital signs: Colorectal cancer screening test use‒United States, 2012. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2013;62(44):881–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vernon SW. Participation in colorectal cancer screening: A review. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997;89(19):1406–22. - PubMed