Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Nov;25(11):3425-3435.
doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3762-0. Epub 2017 Jun 8.

Clinical practice guidelines of the French Association for Supportive Care in Cancer and the French Society for Psycho-oncology: refusal of treatment by adults afflicted with cancer

Affiliations

Clinical practice guidelines of the French Association for Supportive Care in Cancer and the French Society for Psycho-oncology: refusal of treatment by adults afflicted with cancer

J C Faivre et al. Support Care Cancer. 2017 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose: The study's purpose was to develop practical guidelines for assessment and management of refusal of treatment by adults afflicted with cancer.

Methods: The French Association for Supportive Care in Cancer and the French Society for Psycho-oncology gathered a task force that applied a consensus methodology to draft guidelines studied predisposing situations, the diagnosis, regulatory aspects, and the management of refusal of treatment by adults afflicted with cancer.

Results: We propose five guidelines: (1) be aware of the conditions/profiles of patients most often associated with refusal of treatment so as to adequately underpin the care and support measures; (2) understand the complexity of the process of refusal and knowing how to accurately identify the type and the modalities of the refused treatments; (3) apply a way to systematically analyze refusal, thereby promoting progression from a situation of disaccord toward a consensual decision; (4) devise procedures, according to the legal context, to address refusal of treatment that safeguards the stakeholders in situations of sustained disaccord; and (5) know the indications for ethical collective decision-making.

Conclusion: The quality of the relationship between patients and health professionals, and the communication between them are essential components involved in reaching a point of consent or refusal of treatment. A process of systematic analysis of refusal is recommended as the only way to ensure that all of the physiological, psychological, and contextual elements that are potentially involved are taken into account.

Keywords: Decision-making; Guidelines; Health professional-patient relations/ethics; Neoplasms; Refusal of treatment; Review.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Urology. 2008 Jun;71(6):1172-6 - PubMed
    1. AMA J Ethics. 2015 Dec 01;17 (12 ):1108-15 - PubMed
    1. Soc Work Health Care. 2009;48(6):614-34 - PubMed
    1. BJU Int. 2005 Apr;95 Suppl 3:16-32 - PubMed
    1. Cancer Nurs. 2007 Jan-Feb;30(1):58-63 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources