Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Aug;296(2):295-301.
doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4420-y. Epub 2017 Jun 8.

Gynecologic oncologists' attitudes and practices relating to integrative medicine: results of a nationwide AGO survey

Affiliations

Gynecologic oncologists' attitudes and practices relating to integrative medicine: results of a nationwide AGO survey

Evelyn Klein et al. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: The growing popularity and acceptance of integrative medicine is evident both among patients and among the oncologists treating them. As little data are available regarding health-care professionals' knowledge, attitudes, and practices relating to the topic, a nationwide online survey was designed.

Methods: Over a period of 11 weeks (from July 15 to September 30, 2014) a self-administered, 17-item online survey was sent to all 676 members of the Research Group on Gynecological Oncology (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie) in the German Cancer Society. The questionnaire items addressed the use of integrative therapy methods, fields of indications for them, advice services provided, level of specific qualifications, and other topics.

Results: Of the 104 respondents (15.4%) using integrative medicine, 93% reported that integrative therapy was offered to breast cancer patients. The second most frequent type of tumor in connection with which integrative therapy methods were recommended was ovarian cancer, at 80% of the participants using integrative medicine. Exercise, nutritional therapy, dietary supplements, herbal medicines, and acupuncture were the methods the patients were most commonly advised to use.

Conclusion: There is considerable interest in integrative medicine among gynecological oncologists, but integrative therapy approaches are at present poorly implemented in routine clinical work. Furthermore there is a lack of specific training. Whether future efforts should focus on extending counseling services on integrative medicine approaches in gynecologic oncology or not, have to be discussed. Evidence-based training on integrative medicine should be implemented in order to safely guide patients in their wish to do something by themselves.

Keywords: Breast cancer; Complementary medicine; Gynecologic oncology; Integrative medicine; Oncologists’ attitudes; Survey.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest

None of the authors reported any conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in the survey involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of institutional and national research committee. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the survey.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Frequencies of recommended integrative therapy methods. TCM traditional Chinese medicine; n = 83 (n = 21 not applicable); multiple responses were allowed
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Frequency with which advice about integrative therapy methods is given during specific phases of treatment and at different time points in the disease; there are no differences in the kind of methods at the different phases and time points of use; n = 86 (n = 18 not applicable); multiple responses were allowed
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Tumor entities in connection with which integrative therapies were suggested. The most common gynecological carcinomas are represented; n = 87 (n = 17 not applicable); multiple responses were allowed

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Horneber M, Bueschel G, Dennert G, et al. How many cancer patients use complementary and alternative medicine: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Integr Cancer Ther. 2012;11(3):187–203. doi: 10.1177/1534735411423920. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Münstedt K, Kirsch K, Milch W, et al. Unconventional cancer therapy—survey of patients with gynaecological malignancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 1996;258(2):81–88. - PubMed
    1. Kreienberg R, Office des Leitlinienprogramms Onkologie . Interdisziplinäre S3-Leitlinie für die Diagnostik, Therapie und Nachsorge des Mammakarzinoms: Langversion 3.0, Aktualisierung 2012, AWMF-Register-Nummer: 032-045OL. Germering/Munich: Zuckschwerdt; 2012.
    1. Schönekaes K, Micke O, Mücke R, et al. Use of complementary/alternative therapy methods by patients with breast cancer. Forsch Komplementarmed Klass Naturheilkd Res Complement Nat Class Med. 2003;10(6):304–308. doi: 10.1159/000075883. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Molassiotis A, Fernadez-Ortega P, Pud D, et al. Use of complementary and alternative medicine in cancer patients: a European survey. Ann Oncol. 2005;16(4):655–663. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdi110. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources