Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jun 9;17(1):564.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4486-2.

Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infection and associated risk factors among village health volunteers in rural communities of southern Thailand

Chuchard Punsawad  1   2 , Nonthapan Phasuk  3   4 , Suchirat Bunratsami  3   4 , Kanjana Thongtup  3 , Niramon Siripakonuaong  3   4 , Somchok Nongnaul  5
Affiliations

Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infection and associated risk factors among village health volunteers in rural communities of southern Thailand

Chuchard Punsawad et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Intestinal parasitic infections remain prevalent and constitute a public health problem in certain rural areas of Thailand. Village health volunteers (VHVs), who are members of a Thai healthcare alliance, function as key providers of health prevention measures, disease control, and health education and share national health promotion campaigns with community members. This study is aimed at evaluating the prevalence, intensity, and risk factors for intestinal parasitic infection in VHVs in order to design community awareness and health education campaigns for the target population.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted between January to April 2016 among village health volunteers (VHVs) from four sub-districts of Nopphitam District, Nakhon Si Thammarat Province, southern Thailand. Subjects for the study were selected using a simple random sampling method. Socio-demographic variables and risk factors were collected by a structured questionnaire. Stool specimens were collected and processed using direct wet mount and formol-ether concentration techniques to determine the presence of parasites and modified Kato-Katz thick smear to determine the intensity of infection.

Results: A total of 324 VHVs were enrolled. The overall prevalence of intestinal helminths was 9.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.3-13.0). The prevalence of hookworm, Strongyloides stercoralis, and Trichuris trichiura were 8.0% (95% CI: 5.3-11.5), 0.9% (95% CI: 0.2-2.7), and 0.3% (95% CI: 0-1.7), respectively. Mean intensity of hookworm infection was 1732 eggs per gram of stool. The prevalence was lower for protozoan infection than for helminth infection. Blastocystis hominis accounted for the highest percentage of intestinal protozoan infections 4.0% (95% CI: 2.2-6.8), followed by Giardia intestinalis 0.6% (95% CI: 0-2.2). No statistically significant difference was observed in the prevalence of intestinal parasitic infection among sub-districts (p > 0.05). Having dogs at home was associated with soil-transmitted helminth (STH) infection in study participants (Crude prevalence ratio [CPR]: 2.3; 95% CI: 1.0-5.2).

Conclusions: This study is the first to describe the prevalence of intestinal parasitic infection VHVs from southern Thailand. Hookworm infection is more prevalent than other types of STH infection. The development of community awareness campaigns and appropriate control measures should be considered to reduce the prevalence of hookworm infection, especially among VHVs who are the key persons providing health education to the community.

Keywords: Intestinal parasitic infection; Nakhon Si Thammarat Province; Risk factors; Thailand; Village health volunteers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Map of Nopphitam District, Nakhon Si Thammarat Province, southern Thailand. (Map from Wikimedia Commons: https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Atlas_of_Thailand#)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Sex-related prevalence of intestinal parasites among study subjects in Nopphitam District, Nakhon Si Thammarat Province, Thailand
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. WHO. Soil-transmitted helminth infections. Fact sheet no.366. 2017. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs366/en/. Accessed 4 Apr 2017.
    1. Wongsaroj T, Nithikathkul C, Rojkitikul W, Nakaia W, Royal L, Rammasut P. National survey of helminthiasis in Thailand. Asian Biomed. 2014;8:779–783.
    1. Boonjaraspinyo S, Boonmars T, Kaewsamut B, Ekobol N, Laummaunwai P, Aukkanimart R, et al. A cross-sectional study on intestinal parasitic infections in rural communities, northeast Thailand. Korean J Parasitol. 2013;51:727–34. doi: 10.3347/kjp.2013.51.6.727. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jiraanankul V, Aphijirawat W, Mungthin M, Khositnithikul R, Rangsin R, Traub RJ, et al. Incidence and risk factors of hookworm infection in a rural community of central Thailand. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2011;84:594–8. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2011.10-0189. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kitvatanachai S, Boonslip S, Watanasatitarpa S. Intestinal parasitic infections in Srimum suburban area of Nakhon Ratchasima Province, Thailand. Trop Biomed. 2008;25:237–242. - PubMed