Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jul;26(7):992-997.
doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0092. Epub 2017 Jun 9.

Making the Case for Investment in Rural Cancer Control: An Analysis of Rural Cancer Incidence, Mortality, and Funding Trends

Affiliations

Making the Case for Investment in Rural Cancer Control: An Analysis of Rural Cancer Incidence, Mortality, and Funding Trends

Kelly D Blake et al. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017 Jul.

Abstract

Estimates of those living in rural counties vary from 46.2 to 59 million, or 14% to 19% of the U.S.

Population: Rural communities face disadvantages compared with urban areas, including higher poverty, lower educational attainment, and lack of access to health services. We aimed to demonstrate rural-urban disparities in cancer and to examine NCI-funded cancer control grants focused on rural populations. Estimates of 5-year cancer incidence and mortality from 2009 to 2013 were generated for counties at each level of the rural-urban continuum and for metropolitan versus nonmetropolitan counties, for all cancers combined and several individual cancer types. We also examined the number and foci of rural cancer control grants funded by NCI from 2011 to 2016. Cancer incidence was 447 cases per 100,000 in metropolitan counties and 460 per 100,000 in nonmetropolitan counties (P < 0.001). Cancer mortality rates were 166 per 100,000 in metropolitan counties and 182 per 100,000 in nonmetropolitan counties (P < 0.001). Higher incidence and mortality in rural areas were observed for cervical, colorectal, kidney, lung, melanoma, and oropharyngeal cancers. There were 48 R- and 3 P-mechanism rural-focused grants funded from 2011 to 2016 (3% of 1,655). Further investment is needed to disentangle the effects of individual-level SES and area-level factors to understand observed effects of rurality on cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(7); 992-7. ©2017 AACR.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

COI Statement: The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Incidence and mortality rates per 100,000 people across rural-urban continuum codes for all cancers, 2009–2013. Codes 1–3 designate metropolitan counties. Codes 4–9 designate non-metropolitan (rural) counties.

References

    1. Kusmin L. Rural America at a glance, 2016 edition. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture; 2016.
    1. 2010 Census Urban and Rural Classification and Urban Area Criteria [Internet] United States Census Bureau; Available from: < https://www.census.gov/geo/reference/ua/urban-rural-2010.html>.
    1. Bolin JN, Bellamy GR, Ferdinand AO, Vuong AM, Kash BA, Schulze A, et al. Rural Healthy People 2020: New Decade, Same Challenges. J Rural Health. 2015;31(3):326–33. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12116. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moy E, Garcia MC, Bastian B, Rossen LM, Ingram DD, Faul M, et al. Leading Causes of Death in Nonmetropolitan and Metropolitan Areas — United States, 1999–2014. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2017. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Singh GK, Williams SD, Siahpush M, Mulhollen A. Socioeconomic, Rural-Urban, and Racial Inequalities in US Cancer Mortality: Part I-All Cancers and Lung Cancer and Part II-Colorectal, Prostate, Breast, and Cervical Cancers. J Cancer Epidemiol. 2011;2011:107497. doi: 10.1155/2011/107497. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms