A double-blind comparison of acebutolol (Sectral) and propranolol (Inderal) in the treatment of hypertension in black Nigerian patients
- PMID: 2860041
- DOI: 10.1177/030006058501300207
A double-blind comparison of acebutolol (Sectral) and propranolol (Inderal) in the treatment of hypertension in black Nigerian patients
Abstract
Acebutolol and propranolol were compared in forty-five Black African patients in a double-blind randomized trial carried out at Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital in Kaduna, Nigeria. After a wash-out period of 6 weeks, including placebo administration for the last 4 of those weeks, twenty-seven patients were given acebutolol once daily and eighteen were given propranolol twice daily for 12 weeks, followed by a tapering-off period of 2 weeks, making a total of 14 weeks on active treatment. The two beta-receptor blocking drugs were effective in controlling hypertension with final daily doses ranging from 160 to 320 mg in the propranolol group and 400 to 800 mg in the acebutolol group. The supine systolic blood pressure responses with acebutolol were statistically significant and better than those elicited by propranolol. Acebutolol produced less (resting) bradycardia than did propranolol; this may be related to acebutolol's intrinsic sympathomimetic activity. The only unpleasant side-effects reported in this study were slight dizziness in two patients treated with propranolol and slight tiredness in one patient treated with acebutolol. No significant abnormal changes were noted in laboratory tests or chest X-rays. Electrocardiography detected supraventricular tachyarrythmia in five patients: this disappeared by the end of the study. Acebutolol was shown to be a safe, effective and reliable antihypertensive drug, at least comparable to and probably slightly better than, propranolol in the treatment of hypertension in Black Nigerians. It has the added advantage of a once-daily dose schedule.
Similar articles
-
Acebutolol in essential hypertension: results of two multicenter studies against placebo and propranolol.Am Heart J. 1985 May;109(5 Pt 2):1158-67. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(85)90702-1. Am Heart J. 1985. PMID: 2859780 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of acebutolol and propranolol in essential hypertension.Am Heart J. 1985 Feb;109(2):313-21. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(85)90600-3. Am Heart J. 1985. PMID: 3880995 Clinical Trial.
-
Nadolol and propranolol in the treatment of hypertension: a double-blind comparison.J Int Med Res. 1980;8(3):193-8. doi: 10.1177/030006058000800303. J Int Med Res. 1980. PMID: 6104614 Clinical Trial.
-
Effects of age and race on clinical response to acebutolol in essential hypertension.Am Heart J. 1985 May;109(5 Pt 2):1184-92. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(85)90706-9. Am Heart J. 1985. PMID: 2859783 Clinical Trial.
-
Acebutolol: a review of its pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical uses, and adverse effects.Pharmacotherapy. 1986 Mar-Apr;6(2):45-63. doi: 10.1002/j.1875-9114.1986.tb03451.x. Pharmacotherapy. 1986. PMID: 3012486 Review.
Cited by
-
Pharmacotherapy for hypertension in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMC Med. 2020 Mar 27;18(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01530-z. BMC Med. 2020. PMID: 32216794 Free PMC article.
-
β-Blockers and risk of neuropsychiatric disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Feb;91(2):325-337. doi: 10.1111/bcp.16361. Epub 2024 Dec 10. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2025. PMID: 39658346 Free PMC article.
-
Cost effectiveness of labetalol and propranolol in the treatment of hypertension among blacks.J Natl Med Assoc. 1987 Oct;79(10):1049-55. J Natl Med Assoc. 1987. PMID: 3119865 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical