Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1985 Jun;48(3):824-31.
doi: 10.1128/iai.48.3.824-831.1985.

Adhesion of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli to human small intestinal enterocytes

Adhesion of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli to human small intestinal enterocytes

S Knutton et al. Infect Immun. 1985 Jun.

Abstract

An improved enterocyte adhesion assay has been used to examine a collection of 44 strains of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) for their ability to adhere to the brush border of isolated human duodenal enterocytes. Fourteen strains showed good adhesion; in each case the ability to adhere correlated with the production of colonization factor antigen I or II (CFA/I or CFA/II) fimbriae. CFA/II-positive producing coli surface antigens 1 and 3 (CS1 and CS3), coli surface antigens 2 and 3 (CS2 and CS3), and only coli surface antigen 3 (CS3) each showed good adhesion. CS3-mediated brush border attachment of CFA/II-positive ETEC was demonstrated by electron microscopy with monospecific antibody and an immunogold labeling technique. One CFA/I-positive ETEC strain was nonadherent in the assay, as were ETEC producing type 1 somatic fimbriae. Five animal ETEC strains producing K88, K99, F41, and 987P fimbriae were slightly more adhesive than control strains, but adhesion was significantly less than that of CFA-positive ETEC. Twenty five human ETEC strains that lacked CFA/I and CFA/II were nonadherent, suggesting either that the surface antigens responsible for adhesion to human intestinal mucosa in these strains were not being produced or that mucosal receptors for these strains are present in regions of the small intestine other than the duodenum.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Cell Biol. 1971 Nov;51(21):452-64 - PubMed
    1. Anat Rec. 1958 Nov;132(3):247-59 - PubMed
    1. J Biol Chem. 1973 Apr 10;248(7):2536-41 - PubMed
    1. Infect Immun. 1975 Sep;12(3):656-67 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1975 Nov 15;2(7942):946-8 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources