Substance Use Disorder Treatment Following Clinician-Initiated Discontinuation of Long-Term Opioid Therapy Resulting from an Aberrant Urine Drug Test
- PMID: 28600754
- PMCID: PMC5602757
- DOI: 10.1007/s11606-017-4084-0
Substance Use Disorder Treatment Following Clinician-Initiated Discontinuation of Long-Term Opioid Therapy Resulting from an Aberrant Urine Drug Test
Abstract
Background: It is unclear whether substance use disorder (SUD) treatment is offered to, or utilized by, patients who are discontinued from long-term opioid therapy (LTOT) following aberrant urine drug tests (UDTs).
Objective: To describe the proportion of patients who were referred to, and engaged in, SUD treatment following LTOT discontinuation and to examine differences in SUD treatment referral and engagement based on the substances that led to discontinuation.
Design: From a sample of 600 patients selected from a national cohort of Veterans Health Administration patients who were discontinued from LTOT, we used manual chart review to identify 169 patients who were discontinued because of a UDT that was positive for alcohol, cannabis, or other illicit or non-prescribed controlled substances.
Main measures: We extracted sociodemographic, clinical, and health care utilization data from patients' electronic medical records.
Key results: Forty-three percent of patients (n = 73) received an SUD treatment referral following LTOT discontinuation and 20% (n = 34) engaged in a new episode of SUD treatment in the year following discontinuation. Logistic regression models controlling for sociodemographic and clinical variables demonstrated that patients who tested positive for cannabis were less likely than patients who tested positive for non-cannabis substances to receive referrals for SUD treatment (aOR = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.23-0.84, p = 0.01) or engage in SUD treatment (aOR = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.19-0.94, p = 0.04). Conversely, those who tested positive for cocaine were more likely to receive an SUD treatment referral (aOR = 3.32, 95% CI = 1.57-7.06, p = 0.002) and engage in SUD treatment (aOR = 2.44, 95% CI = 1.00-5.96, p = 0.05) compared to those who did not have a cocaine-positive UDT.
Conclusions: There may be substance-specific differences in clinician referrals to, and patient engagement in, SUD treatment. This suggests a need for more standardized implementation of clinical guidelines that recommend SUD care, when appropriate, following LTOT discontinuation.
Keywords: chronic pain; long-term opioid therapy; physician referral; substance use treatment.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclaimer
The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the US Department of Veterans Affairs or US Government.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.
Figures
Comment in
-
Irrational Exuberance in Medicine.J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Oct;32(10):1065-1066. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4142-7. J Gen Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 28752359 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Opioids and Substance Abuse: Education or Just Regulation?J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Oct;32(10):1067-1068. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4137-4. J Gen Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 28755098 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Institute of Medicine . Relieving pain in America: A blueprint for transforming prevention, care, education, and research. Washington: The National Academies Press; 2011. - PubMed
-
- Brennan PL, Del Re AC, Henderson PT, Trafton JA. Healthcare system-wide implementation of opioid-safety guideline recommendations: the case of urine drug screening and opioid-patient suicide- and overdose-related events in the Veterans Health Administration. Trans Behav Med. 2016;6(4):605–612. doi: 10.1007/s13142-016-0423-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical