Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jun 10;18(1):251.
doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1612-3.

Validity of humerus fracture classification in the Swedish fracture register

David Wennergren  1 , Stina Stjernström  2 , Michael Möller  2 , Mikael Sundfeldt  2 , Carl Ekholm  2
Affiliations

Validity of humerus fracture classification in the Swedish fracture register

David Wennergren et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. .

Abstract

Background: The ability to correctly classify fractures is of importance for choosing the appropriate treatment and for providing appropriate data for research and quality registers. In the Swedish Fracture Register (SFR) fractures of all types are registered by the attending physician, often a junior doctor. For the majority of fractures, a modified AO/OTA classification is used. This study aimed to validate the accuracy of classification of humerus fractures in the SFR and also at providing insight into inherent classification uncertainties.

Methods: One hundred and sixteen humerus fractures (among them 90 proximal) were retrieved by computer randomisation from the SFR and reassessed independently at two occasions, 6 weeks apart, by three senior orthopaedic surgeons blinded to patient information and a consensus "gold standard" classification was established. This was compared with the classifications that had been entered into the register.

Results: The agreement between gold standard classification and original classification in the SFR was kappa = 0.57 for all humerus fractures. For proximal humerus fractures kappa-coefficient for intra-observer agreement was 0.593, 0.599 and 0.752 for the three observers respectively. Taking into account the similarities between certain fracture groups, a modified calculation of agreement was performed. With this modification the intra-observer agreement was 0.910-0.974 and inter-observer agreement was 0.912.

Conclusion: The classification of humerus fractures in the Swedish Fracture Register was just as accurate as in previous studies, i.e. moderate as defined by Landis and Koch. However, when we introduced a modified analysis, that takes into account the similarities between certain fractures, the accuracy was "near perfect".

Keywords: Accuracy; Agreement; Fracture classification; Fracture register; Humerus fracture; Validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Fracture groups as presented in the SFR
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Flow chart of how the study was conducted
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Siebenrock KA, Gerber C. The reproducibility of classification of fractures of the proximal end of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:1751–1755. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199312000-00003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sjödén GO, Movin T, Güntner P, Aspelin P, Ahrengart L, Ersmark H, et al. Poor reproducibility of classification of proximal humeral fractures. Additional CT of minor value. Acta Orthop Scand. 1997;68:239–242. doi: 10.3109/17453679708996692. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wennergren D, Ekholm C, Sandelin A, Möller M. The Swedish fracture register: 103,000 fractures registered. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;16:338. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0795-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Müller M, Koch P, Nazarian S, Schatzker J. The comprehensive classification of fractures of long bones. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag; 1990.
    1. Neer CS., 2nd Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. Classification and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970;52:1077–1089. doi: 10.2106/00004623-197052060-00001. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types