Audit and feedback using the Robson classification to reduce caesarean section rates: a systematic review
- PMID: 28602031
- PMCID: PMC5763379
- DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.14774
Audit and feedback using the Robson classification to reduce caesarean section rates: a systematic review
Abstract
Background: In most regions worldwide, caesarean section (CS) rates are increasing. In these settings, new strategies are needed to reduce CS rates.
Objectives: To identify, critically appraise and synthesise studies using the Robson classification as a system to categorise and analyse data in clinical audit cycles to reduce CS rates.
Search strategy: Medline, Embase, CINAHL and LILACS were searched from 2001 to 2016.
Selection criteria: Studies reporting use of the Robson classification to categorise and analyse data in clinical audit cycles to reduce CS rates.
Data collection: Data on study design, interventions used, CS rates, and perinatal outcomes were extracted.
Results: Of 385 citations, 30 were assessed for full text review and six studies, conducted in Brazil, Chile, Italy and Sweden, were included. All studies measured initial CS rates, provided feedback and monitored performance using the Robson classification. In two studies, the audit cycle consisted exclusively of feedback using the Robson classification; the other four used audit and feedback as part of a multifaceted intervention. Baseline CS rates ranged from 20 to 36.8%; after the intervention, CS rates ranged from 3.1 to 21.2%. No studies were randomised or controlled and all had a high risk of bias.
Conclusion: We identified six studies using the Robson classification within clinical audit cycles to reduce CS rates. All six report reductions in CS rates; however, results should be interpreted with caution because of limited methodological quality. Future trials are needed to evaluate the role of the Robson classification within audit cycles aimed at reducing CS rates.
Tweetable abstract: Use of the Robson classification in clinical audit cycles to reduce caesarean rates.
Keywords: Audit and feedback; Robson classification; caesarean section; clinical audit cycle; systematic review; ten-group classification.
© 2017 The Authors. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Robson ten group classification system for Caesarean sections across Europe: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2025 Feb;305:178-198. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.11.052. Epub 2024 Dec 4. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2025. PMID: 39705988
-
Impact of clinical audits on cesarean section rate in a Spanish hospital: Analysis of 6 year data according to the Robson classification.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Nov;254:308-314. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.09.017. Epub 2020 Sep 15. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020. PMID: 33039839
-
The Project Appropriate Birth and a reduction in caesarean section rates: an analysis using the Robson classification system.BJOG. 2022 Jan;129(1):72-80. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16919. Epub 2021 Oct 12. BJOG. 2022. PMID: 34529333
-
Caesarean section rates: applying the modified ten-group Robson classification in an Australian tertiary hospital.J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Jan;42(1):61-66. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2021.1873923. Epub 2021 May 2. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022. PMID: 33938362
-
Maternity service organisational interventions that aim to reduce caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analyses.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Jul 9;19(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2351-2. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019. PMID: 31286892 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Improving the Management of High-Risk Pregnancies with the Use of the Robson Classification.Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2020 Aug;42(8):448-453. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1713910. Epub 2020 Sep 8. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2020. PMID: 32898911 Free PMC article.
-
A step towards better audit: The Robson Ten Group classification system for outcomes other than cesarean section.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 Jul;101(7):827-835. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14350. Epub 2022 Mar 16. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022. PMID: 35292960 Free PMC article.
-
A before and after study of the impact on obstetric and perinatal outcomes following the introduction of an educational package of fetal heart rate monitoring education coupled with umbilical artery lactate sampling in a low resource setting labor ward in South Africa.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Nov 6;19(1):405. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2552-8. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019. PMID: 31694569 Free PMC article.
-
An Analysis of Caesarean Sections in a Community Cottage Hospital in Nigeria's Niger Delta Using The Robson Classification.Niger Med J. 2022 Sep 11;63(2):91-97. eCollection 2022 Mar-Apr. Niger Med J. 2022. PMID: 38803701 Free PMC article.
-
The effectiveness of care bundles for reducing caesarean section safely: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2025 Jun 13;20(6):e0326158. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326158. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 40512717 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Khunpradit S, Tavender E, Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Wasiak J, Gruen RL. Non‐clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;(6):CD005528. - PubMed
-
- Hartmann KE, Andrews JC, Jerome RN, Lewis RM, Likis FE, McKoy JN, et al. Strategies to reduce cesarean birth in low‐risk women. AHRQ Publication No. 12(13)‐EHC128‐EF2012. - PubMed
-
- Shaw D. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Principles for Best Practice in Clinical Audit. Abingdon: Radcliffe Publishing, 2002.
-
- Chaillet N, Dumont A. Evidence‐based strategies for reducing cesarean section rates: a meta‐analysis. Birth 2007;34:53–64. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Molecular Biology Databases