Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2018 Jan;125(1):36-42.
doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14774. Epub 2017 Jul 17.

Audit and feedback using the Robson classification to reduce caesarean section rates: a systematic review

A A Boatin  1 , F Cullinane  2 , M R Torloni  3 , A P Betrán  4
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Audit and feedback using the Robson classification to reduce caesarean section rates: a systematic review

A A Boatin et al. BJOG. 2018 Jan.

Abstract

Background: In most regions worldwide, caesarean section (CS) rates are increasing. In these settings, new strategies are needed to reduce CS rates.

Objectives: To identify, critically appraise and synthesise studies using the Robson classification as a system to categorise and analyse data in clinical audit cycles to reduce CS rates.

Search strategy: Medline, Embase, CINAHL and LILACS were searched from 2001 to 2016.

Selection criteria: Studies reporting use of the Robson classification to categorise and analyse data in clinical audit cycles to reduce CS rates.

Data collection: Data on study design, interventions used, CS rates, and perinatal outcomes were extracted.

Results: Of 385 citations, 30 were assessed for full text review and six studies, conducted in Brazil, Chile, Italy and Sweden, were included. All studies measured initial CS rates, provided feedback and monitored performance using the Robson classification. In two studies, the audit cycle consisted exclusively of feedback using the Robson classification; the other four used audit and feedback as part of a multifaceted intervention. Baseline CS rates ranged from 20 to 36.8%; after the intervention, CS rates ranged from 3.1 to 21.2%. No studies were randomised or controlled and all had a high risk of bias.

Conclusion: We identified six studies using the Robson classification within clinical audit cycles to reduce CS rates. All six report reductions in CS rates; however, results should be interpreted with caution because of limited methodological quality. Future trials are needed to evaluate the role of the Robson classification within audit cycles aimed at reducing CS rates.

Tweetable abstract: Use of the Robson classification in clinical audit cycles to reduce caesarean rates.

Keywords: Audit and feedback; Robson classification; caesarean section; clinical audit cycle; systematic review; ten-group classification.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Robson classification system. Reproduced with permission from World Health Organization. WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates WHO/RHR/15.02. 2015.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Betran AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Zhang J, Gulmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The Increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990–2014. PLoS ONE 2016;11:e0148343. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Khunpradit S, Tavender E, Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Wasiak J, Gruen RL. Non‐clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;(6):CD005528. - PubMed
    1. Hartmann KE, Andrews JC, Jerome RN, Lewis RM, Likis FE, McKoy JN, et al. Strategies to reduce cesarean birth in low‐risk women. AHRQ Publication No. 12(13)‐EHC128‐EF2012. - PubMed
    1. Shaw D. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Principles for Best Practice in Clinical Audit. Abingdon: Radcliffe Publishing, 2002.
    1. Chaillet N, Dumont A. Evidence‐based strategies for reducing cesarean section rates: a meta‐analysis. Birth 2007;34:53–64. - PubMed