Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 May 26:8:716.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00716. eCollection 2017.

Adolescent Girls' STEM Identity Formation and Media Images of STEM Professionals: Considering the Influence of Contextual Cues

Affiliations
Review

Adolescent Girls' STEM Identity Formation and Media Images of STEM Professionals: Considering the Influence of Contextual Cues

Jocelyn Steinke. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Popular media have played a crucial role in the construction, representation, reproduction, and transmission of stereotypes of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) professionals, yet little is known about how these stereotypes influence STEM identity formation. Media images of STEM professionals may be important sources of information about STEM and may be particularly salient and relevant for girls during adolescence as they actively consider future personal and professional identities. This article describes gender-stereotyped media images of STEM professionals and examines theories to identify variables that explain the potential influence of these images on STEM identity formation. Understanding these variables is important for expanding current conceptual frameworks of science/STEM identity to better determine how and when cues in the broader sociocultural context may affect adolescent girls' STEM identity. This article emphasizes the importance of focusing on STEMidentity relevant variables and STEM identity status to explain individual differences in STEM identity formation.

Keywords: STEM stereotypes; media images; perceptions of scientists; science/STEM identity formation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Science identity status based on Marcia’s (1980) identity status theory.

References

    1. Ahlqvist S., London B., Rosenthal L. (2013). Unstable identity compatibility: how gender rejection sensitivity undermines the success of women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics fields. Psychol. Sci. 24 1644–1652. 10.1177/0956797613476048 - DOI - PubMed
    1. American Association of University Women (2000). Tech-savvy: Education Girls in the New Computer Age. Washington, DC: AAUW Educational Foundation.
    1. American Association of University Women (2015). Solving the Equation: The Variables for Women’s Success in Engineering and Computing. Washington, DC: American Association University Women.
    1. Archer L., Dewitt J., Osborne J., Dillon J., Willis B., Wong B. (2012). “Balancing Acts”: elementary school girls’ negotiation of femininity, achievement, and science. Sci. Educ. 96 967–989. 10.1002/sce.21031 - DOI
    1. Bandura A. (1969). “Social-learning theory of identificatory processes,” in Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research, ed. Goslin D. A. (Chicago, IL: Rand McNally College Publishing Company; ), 213–262.

LinkOut - more resources