Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 May 3;5(3):e00318.
doi: 10.1002/prp2.318. eCollection 2017 Jun.

Make up a missed lesson-New policy to ensure the interchangeability of generic drugs in China

Affiliations

Make up a missed lesson-New policy to ensure the interchangeability of generic drugs in China

Baobin Huang et al. Pharmacol Res Perspect. .

Abstract

Generic drugs should be interchangeable with originators in terms of quality and efficacy. With relative lower prices, generic drugs are playing an important role in controlling health expenditures and ensuring access. However, the widespread understanding of "cheap price equals low quality" has a negative impact on the acceptance of generic drugs. In China, medical doctors doubt the efficacy and quality of generic drugs manufactured domestically. To address these concerns, the Chinese State Council released a policy in 2016 to ensure the interchangeability by re-evaluating the quality and efficacy of generic drugs. It intends to make up a missed lesson in the regulation to be in line with internationally accepted practices. Generic drugs firms, depends on the availability of appropriate comparators, should conduct either comparative bioequivalence studies or full scale clinical trials. The re-evaluation will be implemented in a stepwise approach with the essential medicines covered in the first step. The policy could achieve several benefits by increasing confidence on the Chinese produced generic drugs, upgrading regulatory standards, streamlining the Chinese generic drug industry and creating a healthy competition market. Nevertheless, enormous challenges remain in enlarging the capacity to review applications, selecting appropriate comparators, ensuring the capacity of domestic clinical research sites, and achieving the acceptance of re-evaluated generic drugs.

Keywords: Bioequivalence studies; clinical trial; comparators; drug regulation; efficacy; essential medicines; generic drugs; generic drugs industry; interchangeability; quality; re‐evaluation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Alrasheedy AA, Hassali MA, Aljadhey H, Al‐Tamimi SK (2014). The need to cover generic medications and generic substitution practice in the curricula of pharmacy colleges in Saudi Arabia. Am J Pharm Educ 78: 1–2. - PMC - PubMed
    1. AL‐Tamimi SK, MA H, AA S, AA A (2016). The need to incorporate generic medicines topic in the curriculum of Yemeni pharmacy colleges. Int J Pharm Pract 24:72–73. - PubMed
    1. Cameron A, Mantel‐Teeuwisse AK, Leufkens HG, Laing RO (2012). Switching from originator brand medicines to generic equivalents in selected developing countries: how much could be saved? Value Health 15: 664–673. - PubMed
    1. China Pharmaceuticals News (2016). Key aspects of re‐evaluation of generic drugs in China (in Chinese). Available at: http://www.cnpharm.cn/yaopin/rdzz/20160322/98066.html (accessed October 7, 2016).
    1. European Medicines Agency (2012). Questions and Answers on generic medicines. Available at:http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Medicine_QA/2009/11... (accessed 17 March 2017).

LinkOut - more resources