Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Dec;4(4):312-319.
doi: 10.1007/s40141-016-0139-0. Epub 2016 Nov 19.

The Present and Future of Robotic Technology in Rehabilitation

Jeffrey Laut  1 , Maurizio Porfiri  1 , Preeti Raghavan  2
Affiliations

The Present and Future of Robotic Technology in Rehabilitation

Jeffrey Laut et al. Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep. 2016 Dec.

Abstract

Robotic technology designed to assist rehabilitation can potentially increase the efficiency of and accessibility to therapy by assisting therapists to provide consistent training for extended periods of time, and collecting data to assess progress. Automatization of therapy may enable many patients to be treated simultaneously and possibly even remotely, in the comfort of their own homes, through telerehabilitation. The data collected can be used to objectively assess performance and document compliance as well as progress. All of these characteristics can make therapists more efficient in treating larger numbers of patients. Most importantly for the patient, it can increase access to therapy which is often in high demand and rationed severely in today's fiscal climate. In recent years, many consumer grade low-cost and off-the-shelf devices have been adopted for use in therapy sessions and methods for increasing motivation and engagement have been integrated with them. This review paper outlines the effort devoted to the development and integration of robotic technology for rehabilitation.

Keywords: gaming; medical devices; patient adherence; rehabilitation; rehabilitation engineering; robotics; stroke; telerehabilitation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Jeffrey Laut, Maurizio Porfiri, and Preeti Raghavan declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Gardner EN, et al. The cost of Medicaid-covered services provided to disabled adults with neurologic disorders: implications for managed care. The American Journal of Managed Care. 1999;5(11):1417–1425. - PubMed
    1. Winstein CJ, et al. Guidelines for Adult Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2016;47(6):e98–e169. - PubMed
    1. Slater RJ. A model of care Matching human services to patients’ needs. Neurology. 1980;30(7 Part 2):39–43. - PubMed
    1. Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8(8):741–54. - PubMed
    1. Krebs HI, et al. A paradigm shift for rehabilitation robotics. Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, IEEE. 2008;27(4):61–70.

LinkOut - more resources