Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Sep;53(9):1738-1749.
doi: 10.1037/dev0000363. Epub 2017 Jun 12.

Romantic relationship development: The interplay between age and relationship length

Affiliations

Romantic relationship development: The interplay between age and relationship length

Ann Lantagne et al. Dev Psychol. 2017 Sep.

Abstract

The present study explored how romantic relationship qualities develop with age and relationship length. Eight waves of data on romantic relationships were collected over 10.5 years during adolescence and early adulthood from a community-based sample in a Western U.S. city (100 males, 100 females; M age Wave 1 = 15.83). Measures of support, negative interactions, control, and jealousy were derived from interviews and questionnaire measures. Using multilevel modeling, main effects of age were found for jealousy, and main effects of relationship length were found for each quality. However, main effects were qualified by significant age by length interactions for each and every relationship quality. Short relationships increased in support with age. In comparison, long-term adolescent relationships were notable in that they were both supportive and turbulent, with elevated levels of support, negative interactions, control, and jealousy. With age, long-term relationships continued to have high levels of support, but decreased in negative interactions, control, and jealousy. Present findings highlight how the interplay between age and relationship length is key for understanding the development of romantic relationships. (PsycINFO Database Record

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Interaction between age and relationship length on ratings of support.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Interaction between age and relationship length on ratings of negative interactions.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Interaction between age and relationship length on ratings of jealousy.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Interaction between age and relationship length on ratings of control.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Achenbach TM. Integrative guide for the 1991 CBCL/4–18, YSR, and TRF profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry; 1991.
    1. Adams RE, Laursen B, Wilder D. Characteristics of closeness in adolescent romantic relationships. Journal of Adolescence. 2001;24:353–363. doi: 10.1006/jado.2000.0402. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adler TF, Furman W. A model for children’s relationships and relationship dysfunctions. In: Duck S, Hay DF, Hobfoll SE, Ickes W, Montgomery BM, editors. Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research, and interventions. Oxford, England: John Wiley & Sons; 1988. pp. 211–232.
    1. Behrens JT. Principles and procedures of exploratory data analysis. Psychological Methods. 1997;2:131–160. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.2.2.131. - DOI
    1. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological) 1995;57:289–300.

Publication types