Multicenter Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced FDG PET/CT and 64-Slice Multi-Detector-Row CT for Initial Staging and Response Evaluation at the End of Treatment in Patients With Lymphoma
- PMID: 28604477
- PMCID: PMC5502123
- DOI: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000001718
Multicenter Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced FDG PET/CT and 64-Slice Multi-Detector-Row CT for Initial Staging and Response Evaluation at the End of Treatment in Patients With Lymphoma
Abstract
Objectives: To compare staging correctness between contrast-enhanced FDG PET/ceCT and 64-slice multi-detector-row CT (ceCT64) for initial staging and response evaluation at the end of treatment (EOT) in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma, diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), and follicular lymphoma.
Methods: This prospective study compared initial staging and response evaluation at EOT. One hundred eighty-one patients were randomly assigned to either ceCT64 or FDG PET/ceCT. A nuclear medicine physician and a radiologist read FDG PET/ceCT scans independently and achieved post hoc consensus, whereas another independent radiologist interpreted ceCT64 separately. The reference standard included all clinical information, all tests, and follow-up. Ethics committees of the participating centers approved the study, and all participants provided written consent.
Results: Ninety-one patients were randomized to ceCT64 and 90 to FDG PET/ceCT; 72 had Hodgkin lymphoma, 72 had DLBCL, and 37 had follicular lymphoma. There was excellent correlation between the reference standard and initial staging for both FDG PET/ceCT (κ = 0.96) and ceCT64 (κ = 0.84), although evaluation of the response at EOT was excellent only for FDG PET/ceCT (κ = 0.91).
Conclusions: Our study demonstrated satisfactory agreement between FDG PET/ceCT (κ = 0.96) and ceCT64 (κ = 0.84) in initial staging compared with the reference standard (P = 0.16). Response evaluation at EOT with FDG PET/ceCT (κ = 0.91) was superior compared with ceCT64 (κ = 0.307) (P < 0.001).
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest and sources of funding: This work was financially supported by the Spanish Health Ministry through the Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias (F.I.S.) of the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid (file no. 11/01800) granted in 2011. The final report was presented in 2016.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Evaluation of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients with 64-slice multidetector computed tomography versus 18FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography in initial staging and restaging after treatment.Med Clin (Barc). 2018 Oct 12;151(7):255-264. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2018.03.010. Epub 2018 Apr 26. Med Clin (Barc). 2018. PMID: 29705152 Clinical Trial. English, Spanish.
-
Diagnostic Contribution of Contrast-Enhanced CT as Compared with Unenhanced Low-Dose CT in PET/CT Staging and Treatment Response Assessment of 18F-FDG-Avid Lymphomas: A Prospective Study.J Nucl Med. 2021 Oct;62(10):1372-1379. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.120.259242. Epub 2021 Mar 12. J Nucl Med. 2021. PMID: 33712534
-
Can full-dose contrast-enhanced CT be omitted from an FDG-PET/CT staging examination in newly diagnosed FDG-avid lymphoma?J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2014 Jul-Aug;38(4):620-5. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000067. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2014. PMID: 24681861
-
PET/CT for Lymphoma Post-therapy Response Assessment in Other Lymphomas, Response Assessment for Autologous Stem Cell Transplant, and Lymphoma Follow-up.Semin Nucl Med. 2018 Jan;48(1):37-49. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2017.09.004. Epub 2017 Nov 6. Semin Nucl Med. 2018. PMID: 29195616 Review.
-
FDG-PET/CT in the management of lymphomas: current status and future directions.J Intern Med. 2018 Oct;284(4):358-376. doi: 10.1111/joim.12813. Epub 2018 Jul 24. J Intern Med. 2018. PMID: 29989234 Review.
Cited by
-
Identification of superficial invasive and indolent lymphomatous lymph nodes by multiple ultrasonographic vascular imaging.Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 22;15(1):9886. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-93545-w. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40121257 Free PMC article.
-
FDG-PET Imaging for Hodgkin and Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma-An Updated Overview.Cancers (Basel). 2020 Mar 5;12(3):601. doi: 10.3390/cancers12030601. Cancers (Basel). 2020. PMID: 32150986 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Predicting survival, neurotoxicity and response in B-cell lymphoma patients treated with CAR-T therapy using an imaging features-based model.EJNMMI Res. 2024 Nov 20;14(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s13550-024-01172-9. EJNMMI Res. 2024. PMID: 39567446 Free PMC article.
-
Whole-body MRI Versus [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT in Diagnosing and Monitoring Plasmacytomas : A Comparative Study.Clin Nucl Med. 2025 Aug 1;50(8):695-706. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000005954. Epub 2025 May 16. Clin Nucl Med. 2025. PMID: 40375446 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic performance of prospective same-day 18F-FDG PET/MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT in the staging and response assessment of lymphoma.Cancer Imaging. 2023 Jan 24;23(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s40644-023-00520-7. Cancer Imaging. 2023. PMID: 36694244 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:225–249. - PubMed
-
- Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Harris NL, et al. WHO Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. 4th ed Lyon, France: IARC; 2008.
-
- Hicks RJ, Mac Manus MP, Seymour JF. Initial staging of lymphoma with positron emission tomography and computed tomography. Semin Nucl Med. 2005;35:165–175. - PubMed
-
- Kwee TC, Kwee RM, Nievelstein RA. Imaging in staging of malignant lymphoma: a systematic review. Blood. 2008;111:504–516. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical