Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jun 12;7(1):3267.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03539-6.

Consistent effects of nitrogen fertilization on soil bacterial communities in black soils for two crop seasons in China

Affiliations

Consistent effects of nitrogen fertilization on soil bacterial communities in black soils for two crop seasons in China

Jing Zhou et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Long-term use of inorganic nitrogen (N) fertilization has greatly influenced the bacterial community in black soil of northeast China. It is unclear how N affects the bacterial community in two successive crop seasons in the same field for this soil type. We sampled soils from a long-term fertilizer experimental field in Harbin city with three N gradients. We applied sequencing and quantitative PCR targeting at the 16S rRNA gene to examine shifts in bacterial communities and test consistent shifts and driving-factors bacterial responses to elevated N additions. N addition decreased soil pH and bacterial 16S rDNA copy numbers, and increased soil N and crop yield. N addition consistently decreased bacterial diversity and altered bacterial community composition, by increasing the relative abundance of Proteobacteria, and decreasing that of Acidobacteria and Nitrospirae in both seasons. Consistent changes in the abundant classes and genera, and the structure of the bacterial communities across both seasons were observed. Our results suggest that increases in N inputs had consistent effects on the richness, diversity and composition of soil bacterial communities across the crop seasons in two continuous years, and the N addition and the subsequent edaphic changes were important factors in shaping bacterial community structures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Abundance of bacteria as indicated by the numbers of 16S rDNA copies measured using quantitative PCR. sCK, sN1 and sN2 indicate different N treatments in the soybean season; wCK, wN1 and wN2 indicate different N treatments in the wheat season. The ‘r’ indicates Pearson’s correlation coefficient between N added and 16S rDNA copies (**P < 0.01, *P < 0.05).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Differences in bacterial community diversity and richness between different N fertilizer regimes. (A) Community diversity between different N fertilizer regimes (both wheat and soybean seasons). (B) Community richness between different N fertilizer regimes (both wheat and soybean seasons). Asterisks show significant differences between samples (**P < 0.01, *P < 0.05, Tukey r-test). sCK, sN1 and sN2 indicate different N treatments in the soybean season; wCK, wN1 and wN2 indicate different N treatments in the wheat season.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Bacterial compositions of different N fertilizer regimes. Each bar represents the average relative abundance of each bacterial taxon within a group. The top 20 abundant phyla are shown (relative abundance >0.01%). sCK, sN1 and sN2 indicate different N treatments in the soybean season; wCK, wN1 and wN2 indicate different N treatments in the wheat season.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Changes in the relative abundances of bacterial genera across the N gradients in the wheat (A) and soybean (B) seasons. Only shown are those classes correlated with N added (Spearman’s r-values). Bars indicate one standard deviation. Asterisks show significant correlations (**P < 0.01, *P < 0.05). sCK, sN1 and sN2 indicate different N treatments in the soybean season; wCK, wN1 and wN2 indicate different N treatments in the wheat season.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Principal coordinate analysis of pyrosequencing reads obtained from soils subjected to different fertilization regimes based on the weighted Fast UniFrac metric. The first three axes are shown and the percent of variance explained by each axis is given.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Galloway JN, et al. Transformation of the nitrogen cycle: recent trends, questions, and potential solutions. Science. 2008;320:889–892. doi: 10.1126/science.1136674. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhou J, et al. Thirty four years of nitrogen fertilization decreases fungal diversity and alters fungal community composition in black soil in northeast China. Soil Biology & Biochemistry. 2016;95:135–143. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.12.012. - DOI
    1. Lamarque JF, et al. Assessing future nitrogen deposition and carbon cycle feedback using a multimodel approach. Analysis of nitrogen deposition. 2005;110:2657–2677.
    1. Simkin SM, et al. Conditional vulnerability of plant diversity to atmospheric nitrogen deposition across the United States. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113:4086–4091. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1515241113. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang, N. et al. Variability in responses of bacterial communities and nitrogen oxide emission to urea fertilization among various flooded paddy soils. Fems Microbiology Ecology91 (2015). - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources