Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 May 29:11:1178221817711418.
doi: 10.1177/1178221817711418. eCollection 2017.

Interactions of Cannabinoids With Biochemical Substrates

Affiliations
Review

Interactions of Cannabinoids With Biochemical Substrates

Brian F Thomas. Subst Abuse. .

Abstract

Recent decades have seen much progress in the identification and characterization of cannabinoid receptors and the elucidation of the mechanisms by which derivatives of the Cannabis sativa plant bind to receptors and produce their physiological and psychological effects. The information generated in this process has enabled better understanding of the fundamental physiological and psychological processes controlled by the central and peripheral nervous systems and has fostered the development of natural and synthetic cannabinoids as therapeutic agents. A negative aspect of this decades-long effort is the proliferation of clandestinely synthesized analogs as recreational street drugs with dangerous effects. Currently, the interactions of cannabinoids with their biochemical substrates are extensively but inadequately understood, and the clinical application of derived and synthetic receptor ligands remains quite limited. The wide anatomical distribution and functional complexity of the cannabinoid system continue to indicate potential for both therapeutic and side effects, which offers challenges and opportunities for medicinal chemists involved in drug discovery and development.

Keywords: Cannabinoids; cannabinoid ligands; cannabinoid receptor subtypes; endocannabinoids; synthetic cannabinoids; Δ9-THC.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

DECLARATION OF CONFLICTING INTERESTS: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Disclosures and Ethics As a requirement of publication author(s) have provided to the publisher signed confirmation of compliance with legal and ethical obligations including, but not limited to, the following: authorship and contributorship, conflicts of interest, privacy and confidentiality and (where applicable) protection of human and animal research subjects. The authors have read and confirmed their agreement with the ICMJE authorship and conflict of interest criteria. The authors have also confirmed that this article is unique and not under consideration or published in any other publication, and that they have permission from rights holders to reproduce any copyrighted material. Any disclosures are made in this section. The external blind peer reviewers report no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Δ9-THC, the principal psychoactive constituent in Cannabis sativa.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Four potent synthetic cannabinoids.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Radioligand autoradiograph of specific binding of [3H] CP-55,940 to a sagittal section of rat brain, showing high CB1 receptor densities in the hippocampus, basal ganglia, and cerebellum.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Cannabinoid receptor signaling and trafficking. Modified and reproduced with permission from Al-Hasani and Bruchas.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The CB1- and the CB2-selective inverse agonists SR141716A (left) and SR144528 (right).
Figure 6
Figure 6
CB1 allosteric modulators. Org 27569 (left) and PSNCBAM-1 (right) display positive binding cooperativity with the orthosteric agonist CP-55,940 for CB1 receptor binding as would positive allosteric modulators, but reduce the efficacy of orthosteric agonists in several in vitro functional assays.
Figure 7
Figure 7
The endocannabinoids arachidonoylethanolamine (anandamide, left) and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG, right).
Figure 8
Figure 8
Neuronal endocannabinoid system. Reproduced with permission from Lu and Mackie.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Johnson M, Melvin L, Althuis T, et al. Selective and potent analgetics derived from cannabinoids. J Clin Pharmacol. 1981;21:271S–282S. - PubMed
    1. Johnson MR, Melvin LS, Milne GM. Prototype cannabinoid analgetics, prostaglandins and opiates—a search for points of mechanistic interaction. Life Sci. 1982;31:1703–1706. - PubMed
    1. Johnson MR, Milne GM. Recent discoveries in the search for non-opiate an-algetics. J Heterocyclic Chem. 1980;17:1817–1820.
    1. Razdan RK. Structure-activity relationships in cannabinoids. Pharmacol Rev. 1986;38:75–149. - PubMed
    1. Howlett AC. Cannabinoid inhibition of adenylate cyclase Biochemistry of the response in neuroblastoma cell membranes. Mol Pharmacol. 1985;27:429–436. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources