Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 May 25;6(1):u219176.w7476.
doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u219176.w7476. eCollection 2017.

A Multifaceted Quality Improvement Programme to Improve Acute Kidney Injury Care and Outcomes in a Large Teaching Hospital

Affiliations

A Multifaceted Quality Improvement Programme to Improve Acute Kidney Injury Care and Outcomes in a Large Teaching Hospital

Leonard Ebah et al. BMJ Qual Improv Rep. .

Abstract

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is now widely recognised as a serious health care issue, occurring in up to 25% of hospital in-patients, often with worsening of outcomes. There have been several reports of substandard care in AKI. This quality improvement (QI) programme aimed to improve AKI care and outcomes in a large teaching hospital. Areas of documented poor AKI care were identified and specific improvement activities implemented through sequential Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles. An electronic alert system (e-alert) for AKI was developed, a Priority Care Checklist (PCC) was tested with the aid of specialist nurses whilst targeted education activities were carried out and data on care processes and outcomes monitored. The e-alert had a sensitivity of 99% for the detection of new cases of AKI. Key aspects of the PCC saw significant improvements in their attainment: Detection of AKI within 24 hours from 53% to 100%, fluid assessment from 42% to 90%, drug review 48% to 95% and adherence to nine key aspects of care from 40% to 90%. There was a significant reduction in variability of delivered AKI care. AKI incidence reduced from 9% of all hospitalisations at baseline to 6.5% (28% reduction), AKI related length of stay reduced from 22.1 days to 17 days (23% reduction) and time to recovery (AKI days) 15.5 to 9.8 days (36% reduction). AKI related deaths also showed a trend towards reduction, from an average of 38 deaths to 34 (10.5%). The number of cases of hospital acquired AKI were reduced by 28% from 120 to 86 per month. This study demonstrates significant improvements related to a QI programme combining e-alerts, a checklist implemented by a nurse and education in improving key processes of care. This resulted in sustained improvement in key patient outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Process map for AKI diagnosis and management prior to the formation of the AKI team.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Number of cases of hospital-acquired or post-admission AKI.
Figure 3
Figure 3. AKI days or time to recovery.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kellum J, Lameire N, Group ftKAGW Diagnosis, evaluation, and management of acute kidney injury: a KDIGO summary (Part 1). Critical Care 2013;17:204. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kaufman J, Dhakal M, Patel B et al. . Community-acquired acute renal failure. Am J Kidney Dis 1991;17:191–8. - PubMed
    1. Hoste EA, Schurgers M. Epidemiology of acute kidney injury: how big is the problem? Crit Care Med 2008;36:S146–51. - PubMed
    1. Selby NM, Crowley L, Fluck RJ et al. . Use of Electronic Results Reporting to Diagnose and Monitor AKI in Hospitalized Patients. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2012;7:533–540. - PubMed
    1. Wang HE, Muntner P, Chertow GM et al. . Acute Kidney Injury and Mortality in Hospitalized Patients. American Journal of Nephrology 2012;35:349–355. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources