Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jun 12;31(6):771-789.e6.
doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2017.05.006.

Kupffer Cell-Derived Tnf Triggers Cholangiocellular Tumorigenesis through JNK due to Chronic Mitochondrial Dysfunction and ROS

Affiliations

Kupffer Cell-Derived Tnf Triggers Cholangiocellular Tumorigenesis through JNK due to Chronic Mitochondrial Dysfunction and ROS

Detian Yuan et al. Cancer Cell. .

Abstract

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is a highly malignant, heterogeneous cancer with poor treatment options. We found that mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress trigger a niche favoring cholangiocellular overgrowth and tumorigenesis. Liver damage, reactive oxygen species (ROS) and paracrine tumor necrosis factor (Tnf) from Kupffer cells caused JNK-mediated cholangiocellular proliferation and oncogenic transformation. Anti-oxidant treatment, Kupffer cell depletion, Tnfr1 deletion, or JNK inhibition reduced cholangiocellular pre-neoplastic lesions. Liver-specific JNK1/2 deletion led to tumor reduction and enhanced survival in Akt/Notch- or p53/Kras-induced ICC models. In human ICC, high Tnf expression near ICC lesions, cholangiocellular JNK-phosphorylation, and ROS accumulation in surrounding hepatocytes are present. Thus, Kupffer cell-derived Tnf favors cholangiocellular proliferation/differentiation and carcinogenesis. Targeting the ROS/Tnf/JNK axis may provide opportunities for ICC therapy.

Keywords: JNK; Kupffer cell; Tnf; cholastasis; intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; mitochondrial dysfunction; pro-inflammatory niche; reactive oxygen species; unfolded protein response.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Lack of Hspd1 Causes Acute Liver Damage, Hepatic Proliferation, and Cholangiocellular Tumorigenesis
(A) Electron microscopy and 8-OHdG staining of WT and Hspd1ΔLPC livers. Arrowhead indicates a classic mitophagosome. Scale bars, 0.5 μm (upper), 50 μm (lower). (B) Six- and 8-week-old Hspd1ΔLPC mice and WT littermates. (C) Survival curve of Hspd1ΔLPC and WT mice. (D) Eight-week-old Hspd1ΔLPC and WT littermate livers. Scale bar, 5 mm. (E) Serum from 8-week-old Hspd1ΔLPC mice and WT littermates. Scale bar, 1 cm. (F) Upper: Ki67 staining of 6-week-old Hspd1ΔLPC and WT livers. Black arrowheads, Ki67+ cholangiocytes; white arrowheads, Ki67+ hepatocytes. Lower: double staining of Hspd1 (red) and Ki67 (brown) of 8-week-old Hspd1ΔLPC and WT livers, indicating foci of hepatocyte (white arrowhead) and cholangiocellular (black arrowhead) proliferation. Scale bar, 50 μm. (G) Quantification of cholangiocellular lesions and Ki67+ hepatocytes over time in Hspd1ΔLPC mice and WT littermates. (H) H&E staining of Hspd1ΔLPC liver. Arrowheads indicate biliary intraepithelial neoplasia. Scale bar, 100 μm. (I) IHC analysis in 8-week-old WT and Hspd1ΔLPC livers. Scale bar, 50 μm. (J) Genomic hybridization profiles of CK19+ cholangiocellular neoplasia. (K) Macroscopy (left) and CK19 staining (right) of tumor graft from severe combined immunodeficiency Beige liver. Scale bars, 5 mm (left), 100 μm (right). (L) Quantification of cholangiocellular lesions over time in AAV8-Cre Hspd1loxP/loxP and control mice. (M) H&E and CK19 staining of AAV8-Cre Hspd1loxP/loxP livers. Scale bar, 100 μm. Data are represented as the mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001. ns, not significant. See also Figures S1 and S2.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Oxidative and Pro-carcinogenic Liver Microenvironment in Hspd1ΔLPC Mice
(A) Heatmap of the expression of anti-oxidant genes in Hspd1ΔLPC livers compared with WT over time. Red, upregulated; green, downregulated. (B) Hspd1 and 8-OHdG staining of 8-week-old Hspd1ΔLPC and WT livers. Scale bar, 50 μm. (C) Western blot analysis of Hspd1ΔLPC and WT livers from the indicated ages. (D) Western blot analysis of Hspd1ΔLPC and WT livers from the indicated ages. (E) qRT-PCR for the top upregulated pro-survival genes in Hspd1ΔLPC liver compared with 8-week-old WT liver. Data are represented as the mean ± SEM. (F) Hspd1 and c-Myc IHC in consecutive liver sections from 8-week-old WT and Hspd1ΔLPC mice. The dashed lines indicate the border between the Hspd1+ and Hspd1 areas. Scale bar, 20 μm. See also Figure S3.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Anti-oxidants Attenuate ROS Accumulation and Premalignant Cholangiocellular Lesions in Hspd1ΔLPC Mice
(A) Survival plots for Hspd1ΔLPC mice on normal or BHA diet. (B) Macroscopy of the liver of 6- and 8-week-old Hspd1ΔLPC or 8-week-old WT mice on normal or BHA diet. Scale bar, 1 cm. (C) H&E of the liver of 8-week-old Hspd1ΔLPC mice on normal versus BHA diet and quantification of necrotic areas. Scale bar, 100 μm. (D) Serum ALT, AST, and bilirubin in 8-week-old Hspd1ΔLPC mice on normal and BHA diet. (E) A6 IHC in 8-week-old normal versus BHA diet Hspd1ΔLPC livers and quantification of cholangiocellular overgrowth. Scale bar, 20 μm. (F) qRT-PCR of livers from 8- and 20-week-old normal versus BHA diet Hspd1ΔLPC mice for CK19 and Hnf4α. (G and H) Western blot of liver lysates from 8-week-old normal versus BHA diet Hspd1ΔLPC mice (G) and quantifications the p-JNK to total JNK and the p-Erk1/2 to total Erk1/2 ratio (H). (I) IHC for p-JNK and CHOP in consecutive liver sections from normal versus BHA diet 8-week-old Hspd1ΔLPC mice. Scale bar, 50 μm. (J) qRT-PCR of livers from 8- and 20-week-old normal versus BHA diet Hspd1ΔLPC mice for genes indicated. (K) A schematic depicting the action of BHA in Hspd1ΔLPC mice. Data are represented as the mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. ns, not significant. See also Figure S4.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Kupffer Cells Promote Cholangiocellular Tumorigenesis
(A) Left: schematic of key signals regulating hepato- or cholangiocellular proliferation. Right: qRT-PCR of Hspd1ΔLPC livers at different ages for the expression of key ligands. (B and C) Tnf ELISA (B) and qRT-PCR (C) of WT and normal versus BHA diet 8-week-old Hspd1ΔLPC livers. (D) Tnf and F4/80 IHC in consecutive sections of 8-week-old Hspd1ΔLPC and WT livers. Scale bar, 20 μm. (E) Immunofluorescence (IF) of Tnfr1 and CK19 in 8-week-old Hspd1ΔLPC and WT livers. Scale bar, 20 μm. (F) CK19 IHC and Tnfr1 in situ hybridization in consecutive sections from 8-week-old Hspd1ΔLPC and WT livers. The dashed lines indicate the border between bilary cells and hepatocytes. Scale bar, 20 μm. (G) Upper: timeline of clodronate administration on Hspd1ΔLPC mice. Lower: survival plot for Hspd1ΔLPC mice treated with mock or clodronate. (H) F4/80 and CK19 IHC in consecutive sections from 8-week-old Hspd1ΔLPC livers treated with mock or clodronate. Quantification of each staining was shown in the right panels. Scale bar, 50 μm. (I) Tnf ELISA from 8-week-old Hspd1ΔLPC livers treated with mock or clodronate. (J) Quantification of Ki67+ hepatocytes in Hspd1ΔLPC livers treated with mock or clodronate. Data are represented as the mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. ns, not significant. See also Figure S5.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.. Tnfr1 Signaling Promotes Premalignant Cholangiocellular Lesions
(A) Cell proliferation of WT or Tnfr1−/− cholangiocytes was analyzed by bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation. (B) Hepatoblasts were kept in basal medium or basal medium supplemented with DMSO or Tnf. IF of A6 and Hnf4α was performed. Scale bar, 20 μm. (C) Survival analysis for Hspd1ΔLPC, Hspd1ΔLPC Tnfr1+/−, and Hspd1ΔLPC Tnfr1−/− mice. (D) Macroscopic appearance of 8-week-old Hspd1ΔLPC, Hspd1ΔLPC Tnfr1+/−, and Hspd1ΔLPC Tnfr1−/− livers. Scale bar, 1 cm. (E and F) H&E, A6 and Ki67 IHC, and Tnfr1 in situ hybridization of 8-week-old WT, Hspd1ΔLPC, and Hspd1ΔLPC Tnfr1−/− livers (E), as well as quantification of necrosis and cholangiocellular overgrowth (F). The dashed lines indicate the border between bilary cells and hepatocytes. Scale bar, 50 μm. (G) IHC of 8-week-old Hspd1ΔLPC and Hspd1ΔLPC Tnfr1−/− livers. Scale bar, 20 μm. (H) qRT-PCR of 6- and 8-week-old WT, Hspd1ΔLPC, and Hspd1ΔLPC Tnfr1−/− livers for indicated genes. (I) Percentage of Ki67+ hepatocytes in WT, Hspd1ΔLPC, and Hspd1ΔLPC Tnfr1−/− livers. Data are represented as the mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. ns, not significant. See also Figure S5.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.. JNK/c-Jun Activation Is Required for Premalignant Cholangiocellular Lesions
(A) p-JNK, p-Stat3, and Rela IHC in 8-week-old WT and Hspd1ΔLPC livers. The black arrowhead indicates a p-JNK+ cholangiocyte, the white arrowhead indicates a p-JNK+ hepatocyte. Black arrows indicate positive staining in non-parenchymal cells, while white arrows indicate negative staining in liver parenchymal cells. Scale bar, 20 μm. (B) Rela and c-Jun IF in hepatoblasts cultured in basal medium supplemented with DMSO or Tnf. White arrowheads indicate c-Jun nuclear staining. Scale bar, 20 μm. (C) Timeline of SP600125 administration on Hspd1ΔLPC mice and survival of Hspd1ΔLPC mice not treated (mock) or treated with SP600125. (D) CK19 and Ki67 IHC in 8-week-old Hspd1ΔLPC livers treated with mock or SP600125, and quantification of cholangiolar cancerous lesion areas and Ki67+ cholangiocytes relative to total cholangiocytes. Scale bar, 50 μm. (E) c-Jun IF in hepatoblasts cultured in Tnf-containing medium with or without SP600125. White arrowheads indicate the c-Jun nuclear staining. Scale bar, 20 μm. (F and G) Phase contrast and A6 and Hnf4α IF images (F) and qRT-PCR (G) of hepatoblasts in basal or Tnf-containing medium with or without SP600125. Scale bar, 20 μm. Data are represented as the mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. ns, not significant. See also Figure S6.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.. Kupffer Cell-Derived Tnf/JNK Axis Is Activated in Different ICC Models
(A) IHC of CK19 and p-JNK in liver sections from four ICC models as indicated. The dashed lines indicate the border between ICC and the surrounding liver tissues. Scale bar, 100 μm. (B) F4/80 and Tnf IHC in consecutive sections from CRISPR/cas9-mediated multiplex mutagenesis livers. Scale bar, 20 μm. (C–F) Survival plot (C and E) and representative macroscopic view of ICC and quantification of tumor incidence (D and F) for JNK1/2ΔLPC and control C57BL/6 mice in HDTV-Akt/Notch-induced (C and D) or HDTV-p53/Kras-induced (E and F) ICC model. Scale bar, 1 cm. (G) H&E and IHC staining of Ki67 and p-JNK in livers as indicated in (C and E). Scale bar, 100 μm. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. ns, not significant. See also Figure S7.
Figure 8.
Figure 8.. Tnf and p-JKN Are Strongly Increased in ICC Patient Specimens
(A) H&E and IHC staining of Tnf, p-JNK, and 8-OHdG in a representative human ICC sample. Scale bar, 50 μm. (B and C) Representative IHC images and quantification of Tnf (B) and p-JNK (C) in human ICC and HCC. Arrowheads indicate positive staining. Scale bars, 100 μm (left), 20 μm (right). (D) Model depicting a non-cell-autonomous mechanism of hepatocyte mitochondrial dysfunction in regulating cholangiocellular tumorigenesis. ***p < 0.001. ns, not significant. See also Figure S8.

References

    1. Ariizumi SI, and Yamamoto M (2014). Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and cholangiolocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis and chronic viral hepatitis. Surg. Today 45, 682–687. - PubMed
    1. Arnott CH, Scott KA, Moore RJ, Robinson SC, Thompson RG, and Balkwill FR (2004). Expression of both TNF-alpha receptor subtypes is essential for optimal skin tumour development. Oncogene 23, 1902–1910. - PubMed
    1. Berger E, Yuan D, Waldschmitt N, Rath E, Allgäuer M, Staszewski O, Kober O, Lobner E, Schöttl T, Prinz M, et al. (2016). Mitochondrial function controls epithelial stemness and proliferation in the intestine independent of unfolded protein response signaling mechanisms. Nat. Commun 7, 13171. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boulter L, Govaere O, Bird TG, Radulescu S, Ramachandran P, Pellicoro A, Ridgway RA, Seo SS, Spee B, Van Rooijen N, et al. (2012). Macrophage-derived Wnt opposes Notch signaling to specify hepatic progenitor cell fate in chronic liver disease. Nat. Med 18, 572–579. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boulter L, Guest RV, Kendall TJ, Wilson DH, Wojtacha D, Robson AJ, Ridgway RA, Samuel K, Van Rooijen N, Barry ST, et al. (2015). WNT signaling drives cholangiocarcinoma growth and can be pharmacologically inhibited. J. Clin. Invest 125, 1269–1285. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances