Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Jun;10(6):e005446.
doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.117.005446.

Low-Field Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Compelling Case for Cardiac Magnetic Resonance's Future

Affiliations
Review

Low-Field Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Compelling Case for Cardiac Magnetic Resonance's Future

Orlando P Simonetti et al. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Jun.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Impact of retrospectively lowering SNR on the image quality. A prospectively downsampled (R=3) segmented cine dataset was collected on a 1.5T scanner from a healthy volunteer. Acquisition parameters include: matrix size: 256×192; FOV: 380×285 mm2; TE/TR: 1.47/2.9 ms; slice thickness 8 mm; flip angle: 82°; bandwidth: 714 Hz/pixel; temporal resolution 47 ms; sampling pattern: VISTA; bSSFP-based prospectively triggered segmented sequence. Complex Gaussian noise was then added to simulate data at 1T, 0.5T and 0.35T field strengths. The image recovery was performed using SCoRe.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cine images from the data collected on a 0.35T scanner. Three fully sampled segmented cine datasets (with three different imaging orientations: short-axis (SAX), 4-chamber (4CH), and 2-chamber (2CH)) were collected using the following parameters. Matrix size: 160×120 (SAX), 160×120 (4CH), 192×180 (2CH); FOV: 400×400 mm2 (SAX), 400×400 mm2 (4CH), 400×360 mm2 (2CH); TE/TR: 1.6/3.3 ms (SAX), TE/TR: 1.4/3.0 ms (4CH), TE/TR: 1.3/2.7 ms (SAX); slice thickness 8 mm; flip angle: 110°; bandwidth 558 Hz/pixel (SAX), bandwidth 789 Hz/pixel (4CH), bandwidth 1184 Hz/pixel (2CH), temporal resolution 40 ms (SAX), 45 ms (4CH), 40 ms (2CH); bSSFP-based prospectively triggered segmented sequence. For R=1, image recovery was based on the inverse Fourier transform of k-space data followed by sum-of-squares coil combine. For R=2, the data were retrospectively downsampled with VISTA, and the image recovery was based on SCoRe.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Phase-contrast MRI images from the data collected on a 0.35T scanner. A fully sampled dataset was acquired using the following parameters. Matrix size: 192×108; FOV: 350×262 mm2; TE/TR: 2.6/6.5 ms; slice thickness 8 mm; flip angle: 25°; bandwidth: 389 Hz/pixel; temporal resolution 52 ms; number of averages: 3; FLASH-based prospectively triggered segmented sequence. For R=1, image recovery was based on the inverse Fourier transform of k-space data followed by sum-of-squares coil combine. For R=2, the data were retrospectively downsampled with VISTA, and the image recovery was based on SCoRe. Note, for R=2, no averaging was employed.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Black blood images from the data collected on a 0.35T scanner. A fully sampled dataset was acquired using the following parameters. Matrix size: 192×114; FOV: 450×314 mm2; TE: 40 ms; TR: two RR intervals; echo-train length: 19; echo spacing 6 ms; slice thickness 6 mm; bandwidth: 389 Hz/pixel; turbo spin echo-based segmented sequence. For R=1, image recovery was based on the inverse Fourier transform of k-space data followed by sum-of-squares coil combine. For R=2, the data were retrospectively downsampled with VISTA, and the image recovery was based on SCoRe.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Impact of long TR on image quality. Two fully sampled datasets—one on a 1.5T scanner (top row) and one on 0.35T scanner (bottom row)—were collected. For the dataset collected on 1.5T, the following parameters were used. Matrix size: 192×132; FOV: 450×314 mm2; TE/TR: 4.6/9.2 ms; slice thickness 8 mm; flip angle: 110°; bandwidth: 134 Hz/pixel; temporal resolution 56 ms; bSSFP-based prospectively triggered segmented sequence. For the dataset collected on 0.35T, the following parameters were used. Matrix size: 192×126; FOV: 350×295 mm2; TE/TR: 4.6/9.3 ms; slice thickness 8 mm; flip angle: 110°; bandwidth: 130 Hz/pixel; temporal resolution 56 ms; bSSFP-based prospectively triggered segmented sequence. For R=1, image recovery was based on the inverse Fourier transform of k-space data followed by sum-of-squares coil combine. For R=2, the data were retrospectively downsampled with VISTA, and the image recovery was based on SCoRe.

References

    1. Greenwood JP, Herzog BA, Brown JM, Everett CC, Nixon J, Bijsterveld P, Maredia N, Motwani M, Dickinson CJ, Ball SG, Plein S. Prognostic Value of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance and Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography in Suspected Coronary Heart Disease: Long-Term Follow-up of a Prospective, Diagnostic Accuracy Cohort Study. Annals of internal medicine. 2016 doi: 10.7326/M15-1801. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Greenwood JP, Maredia N, Younger JF, Brown JM, Nixon J, Everett CC, Bijsterveld P, Ridgway JP, Radjenovic A, Dickinson CJ, Ball SG, Plein S. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial. Lancet. 2012;379:453–60. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schwitter J, Wacker CM, Wilke N, Al-Saadi N, Sauer E, Huettle K, Schonberg SO, Debl K, Strohm O, Ahlstrom H, Dill T, Hoebel N, Simor T investigators M-I. Superior diagnostic performance of perfusion-cardiovascular magnetic resonance versus SPECT to detect coronary artery disease: The secondary endpoints of the multicenter multivendor MR-IMPACT II (Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Myocardial Perfusion Assessment in Coronary Artery Disease Trial) Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. 2012;14:61. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wen H, Denison TJ, Singerman RW, Balaban RS. The intrinsic signal-to-noise ratio in human cardiac imaging at 1.5, 3, and 4 T. Journal of magnetic resonance. 1997;125:65–71. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nael K, Fenchel M, Saleh R, Finn JP. Cardiac MR imaging: new advances and role of 3T. Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America. 2007;15:291–300. v. - PubMed

Publication types