Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jun 13;7(1):3364.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03473-7.

Evaluation of the MTBDRplus 2.0 assay for the detection of multidrug resistance among persons with presumptive pulmonary TB in China

Affiliations

Evaluation of the MTBDRplus 2.0 assay for the detection of multidrug resistance among persons with presumptive pulmonary TB in China

Yaoju Tan et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

We have conducted a multicenter study of the diagnostic accuracy of the MTBDRplus 2.0 assay in compared with conventional and molecular reference standard in four tuberculosis (TB)-specialized hospitals of China. A total of 5038 patients were enrolled in this study. The overall sensitivity of the assay for the diagnosis of TB was 92.7% [1723/1858, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 91.5-93.9]. In smear-positive/culture-positive cases the sensitivity was 97.7% (995/1018, 95% CI: 96.6-98.6), whereas in smear-negative/culture-positive cases it was 86.7% (728/840, 95% CI: 84.2-88.9). The agreement rate between MTBDRplus 2.0 and Xpert MTB/RIF was 97.7% (1015/1039, 95% CI: 96.6-98.5) for smear-positive cases and 97.0% (3682/3794, 95% CI: 96.5-97.6) for smear-negative cases. As compared with phenotypic drug susceptibility testing, the MTBDRplus 2.0 correctly identified 298 of 315 patients (94.6%, 95% CI: 91.5-96.8) with rifampicin-resistance. As noted previously, isoniazid resistance is associated with many different mutations and consequently the sensitivity compared to phenotypic testing was lower (81.0%, 95% CI: 76.8-84.7). In conclusion, this assay is a rapid, accurate test in terms of increased sensitivity for detecting smear-negative TB patients, as well as an alternative for detecting both RIF and INH resistance in persons with presumptive TB, whereas the absence of a mutation in the specimens must be interpreted cautiously.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. Zumla A, et al. Drug-resistant tuberculosis–current dilemmas, unanswered questions, challenges, and priority needs. J Infect Dis. 2012;205(Suppl 2):S228–240. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jir858. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Van Rie A, Warren RM. MDR tuberculosis control: time to change the dogma? Lancet Respir Med. 2015;3:907–909. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00477-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhao Y, et al. National survey of drug-resistant tuberculosis in China. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:2161–2170. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1108789. - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2016. WHO/HTM/TB/2016.13 (2016).
    1. Salfinger M. Molecular laboratory testing for tuberculosis: innovators, early adopters, or laggards? Clin Infect Dis. 2014;58:977–979. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu024. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms