Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 May 29:8:804.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00804. eCollection 2017.

Brain Knowledge and the Prevalence of Neuromyths among Prospective Teachers in Greece

Affiliations

Brain Knowledge and the Prevalence of Neuromyths among Prospective Teachers in Greece

Marietta Papadatou-Pastou et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Although very often teachers show a great interest in introducing findings from the field of neuroscience in their classrooms, there is growing concern about the lack of academic instruction on neuroscience on teachers' curricula because this has led to a proliferation of neuromyths. We surveyed 479 undergraduate (mean age = 19.60 years, SD = 2.29) and 94 postgraduate students (mean age = 28.52 years, SD = 7.16) enrolled in Departments of Education at the University of Thessaly and the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens. We used a 70-item questionnaire aiming to explore general knowledge on the brain, neuromyths, the participants' attitude toward neuroeducation as well as their reading habits. Prospective teachers were found to believe that neuroscience knowledge is useful for teachers (90.3% agreement), to be somewhat knowledgeable when it comes to the brain (47.33% of the assertions were answered correctly), but to be less well informed when it comes to neuroscientific issues related to special education (36.86% correct responses). Findings further indicate that general knowledge about the brain was found to be the best safeguard against believing in neuromyths. Based on our results we suggest that prospective teachers can benefit from academic instruction on neuroscience. We propose that such instruction takes place in undergraduate courses of Departments of Education and that emphasis is given in debunking neuromyths, enhancing critical reading skills, and dealing with topics relevant to special education.

Keywords: educational neuroscience; neuroscience; neyromyths; special education; teachers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ansari D. (2015). Mind, brain, and education: a discussion of practical, conceptual, and ethical issues, in Handbook of Neuroethics, eds Clausen J., Levy N. (Dordrecht: Springer; ), 1703–1719.
    1. Ansari D., Coch D. (2006). Bridges over troubled waters: education and cognitive neuroscience. Trends Cogn. Sci. 10, 146–151. 10.1016/j.tics.2006.02.007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ansari D., Coch D., De Smedt B. (2011). Connecting education and cognitive neuroscience: where will the journey take us? Educ. Philos. Theory 43, 37–42. 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00705.x - DOI
    1. Barquero L. A., Davis N., Cutting L. E. (2014). Neuroimaging of reading intervention: a systematic review and activation likelihood estimate meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 9:e83668. 10.1371/journal.pone.0083668 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bartoszeck A. B., Bartoszeck F. K. (2012). How in-service teachers perceive neuroscience as connected to education: an exploratory study. Eur. J. Educ. Res. 1, 301–319. 10.12973/eu-jer.1.4.301 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources