Emergency Department Pain Management Following Implementation of a Geriatric Hip Fracture Program
- PMID: 28611877
- PMCID: PMC5468062
- DOI: 10.5811/westjem.2017.3.32853
Emergency Department Pain Management Following Implementation of a Geriatric Hip Fracture Program
Abstract
Introduction: Over 300,000 patients in the United States sustain low-trauma fragility hip fractures annually. Multidisciplinary geriatric fracture programs (GFP) including early, multimodal pain management reduce morbidity and mortality. Our overall goal was to determine the effects of a GFP on the emergency department (ED) pain management of geriatric fragility hip fractures.
Methods: We performed a retrospective study including patients age ≥65 years with fragility hip fractures two years before and two years after the implementation of the GFP. Outcomes were time to (any) first analgesic, use of acetaminophen and fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) in the ED, and amount of opioid medication administered in the first 24 hours. We used permutation tests to evaluate differences in ED pain management following GFP implementation.
Results: We studied 131 patients in the pre-GFP period and 177 patients in the post-GFP period. In the post-GFP period, more patients received FICB (6% vs. 60%; difference 54%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 45-63%; p<0.001) and acetaminophen (10% vs. 51%; difference 41%, 95% CI 32-51%; p<0.001) in the ED. Patients in the post-GFP period also had a shorter time to first analgesic (103 vs. 93 minutes; p=0.04) and received fewer morphine equivalents in the first 24 hours (15mg vs. 10mg, p<0.001) than patients in the pre-GFP period.
Conclusion: Implementation of a GFP was associated with improved ED pain management for geriatric patients with fragility hip fractures. Future studies should evaluate the effects of these changes in pain management on longer-term outcomes.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: By the WestJEM article submission agreement, all authors are required to disclose all affiliations, funding sources and financial or management relationships that could be perceived as potential sources of bias. No author has professional or financial relationships with any companies that are relevant to this study. There are no conflicts of interest or sources of funding to declare.
Figures
References
-
- Keen RW. Burden of osteoporosis and fractures. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2003;1(2):66–70. - PubMed
-
- National Hospital Discharge Summary, United States, 2010. National Center for Health Statistics; 2010. [Accessed October 11, 2016]. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhds/nhds_tables.htm.
-
- Clinical classifications for health policy research: Hospital Inpatient Statistics/Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, 1996. Rockville, MD: Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Services, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; 1999.
-
- US Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1994. Hip fracture outcomes in people age 50 and over—background paper (OTA-BP-H-120)
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical