Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Jun;96(24):e7161.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007161.

Thymectomy via open surgery or robotic video assisted thoracic surgery: Can a recommendation already be made?

Affiliations
Review

Thymectomy via open surgery or robotic video assisted thoracic surgery: Can a recommendation already be made?

Judith Buentzel et al. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery (RVATS) is a relatively new technique applied for thymectomies. Only few studies directly compare RVATS to the mainstay therapy, open surgery (sternotomy).

Methods: A systematic search of the literature was performed in October 2016. The meta-analysis includes studies comparing robotassisted and open thymectomy regarding operation time, length of hospitalization, intraoperative blood loss, and chest-in-tube days, postoperative complications, reoperation, arrhythmic events, pleural effusion, and postoperative bleeding.

Results: Of 626 studies preliminary screened, 7 articles were included. There were no significant differences in comparison of operation time (-3.19 minutes [95% confidence interval, 95% CI -112.43 to 106.05]; P = .94), but patients undergoing RVATS spent significantly less time in hospital (-4.06 days [95% CI -7.98 to -0.13], P = .046). There were fewer chests-in-tube days (-2.50 days [95% CI -15.01 to 10.01]; P = .24) and less intraoperative blood loss (-256.84 mL [95% CI -627.47 to 113.80]; P = .10) observed in the RVATS group; due to a small number of studies, these results were not statistically significant. There were also less post-operative complications in the RVATS group (12 complications in 209 patients vs 51 complications in 259 patients); however, this difference was not statistical significant (odds ratio 0.27, 95% CI 0.07-1.12; P = .06).

Conclusions: Patients undergoing RVATS spent less time in hospital than patients treated by open surgery (sternotomy). These patients tended to have less postoperative complications, less intraoperative blood loss, and fewer chest-in-tube days. We found evidence for the safety and feasibility of RVATS compared with open surgery, which has to be further confirmed in randomised controlled trials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of studies identified, included, excluded.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean differences of operation time (in min) between robotic and open thymectomy and combined estimate of the operation time.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean differences in length of hospitalization (in d) between robotic and open thymectomy and combined estimate of the length of hospitalization.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mean differences in intraoperative blood loss (in mL) between robotic and open thymectomy and combined estimate of the intraoperative blood loss.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Combined postoperative complications (odds ratio) in robotic and open thymectomy and combined estimate of the complications.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gold R, Schneider-Gold C. Current and future standards in treatment of myasthenia gravis. Neurother J Am Soc Exp Neurother 2008;5:535–41. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Girard N, Mornex F, Houtte PV, et al. Thymoma: a focus on current therapeutic management. J Thorac Oncol 2009;4:119–26. - PubMed
    1. Masaoka A, Monden Y, Nakahara K, et al. Follow-up study of thymomas with special reference to their clinical stages. Cancer 1981;48:2485–92. - PubMed
    1. Scorsetti M, Leo F, Trama A, et al. Thymoma and thymic carcinomas. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2016;99:332–50. - PubMed
    1. Ashton RC, Connery CP, Swistel DG, et al. Robot-assisted lobectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;126:292–3. - PubMed

MeSH terms