Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jun 15;8(6):e98.
doi: 10.1038/ctg.2017.28.

Targeting the vasculature in hepatocellular carcinoma treatment: Starving versus normalizing blood supply

Affiliations

Targeting the vasculature in hepatocellular carcinoma treatment: Starving versus normalizing blood supply

Ken Liu et al. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Traditional treatments for intermediate or advanced stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) such as transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and anti-angiogenesis therapies were developed to starve tumor blood supply. A new approach of normalizing structurally and functionally abnormal tumor vasculature is emerging. While TACE improves survival in selected patients, the resulting tumor hypoxia stimulates proliferation, angiogenesis, treatment resistance and metastasis, which limits its overall efficacy. Vessel normalization decreases hypoxia and improves anti-tumor immune infiltrate and drug delivery. Several pre-clinical agents aimed at normalizing tumor vasculature in HCC appear promising. Although anti-angiogenic agents with vessel normalizing potential have been trialed in advanced HCC with modest results, to date their primary intention had been to starve the tumor. Judicious use of anti-angiogenic therapies is required to achieve vessel normalization yet avoid excessive pruning of vessels. This balance, termed the normalization window, is yet uncharacterized in HCC. However, the optimal class, dose and schedule of vascular normalization agents, alone or in combination with other therapies needs to be explored further.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Guarantor of article: Geoffrey W McCaughan.

Specific author contributions: Literature search, drafting of the article, critical revision of the article: Ken Liu, Geoffrey W McCaughan; contributed to draft, critical revision of the article: Xiang Zhang, Jinbiao Chen, Jun Yu, Jennifer R Gamble; created the figures, critical revision of the article: Weiqi Xu;

All authors have read and approved the final version.

Financial support: None.

Potential conflicts of interest: None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Structure of normal vessels vs. tumor vessels in the liver sinusoid. (a) In healthy liver sinusoids, the endothelium is regular, fenestrated and lacks a basement membrane. Hepatic stellate cells remain in a quiescent state. (b) In hepatocellular carcinoma, the endothelium is thickened and loses its fenestrations while a discontinuous basement membrane is formed through a process called capillarization. Tumor cells form the vessel wall in some areas. Hepatic stellate cells become activated and release vascular endothelial growth factor as well as other angiogenic factors. These vessels are structurally and functionally abnormal.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Vicious cycle of hypoxia, non-productive angiogenesis and tumor growth. Angiogenesis is required for a tumor to grow beyond a few millimeters. However, this neovascularisation produces abnormal leaky vessels which give rise to interstitial hypertension, edema and tumor hypoxia. Although some treatments (e.g., TACE) aim to achieve hypoxia in order to kill the tumor by starvation, hypoxia has been demonstrated to stimulate further angiogenesis and tumor growth through a variety of mechanisms (see text: Limitations of TACE and the effect of tumor hypoxia). HIF-1α, hypoxia-inducible factor 1α IGF-2, insulin-like growth factor-2; MDSC, myeloid-derived suppressor cell; MMP, matrix metalloproteinases; TACE, transarterial chemoembolization; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.

References

    1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M et al. GLOBOCAN 2012 v10, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No 11 [Internet] International Agency for Research on Cancer: Lyon, France, 2013. Available at http://globocan.iarc.fr/. Accessed on 5 February 2017.
    1. Okuda K, Ohtsuki T, Obata H et al. Natural history of hepatocellular carcinoma and prognosis in relation to treatment. Study of 850 patients. Cancer 1985; 56: 918–928. - PubMed
    1. The Cancer of the Liver Italian Program (CLIP) Investigators. A new prognostic system for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective study of 435 patients: the Cancer of the Liver Italian Program (CLIP) investigators. Hepatology 1998; 28: 751–755. - PubMed
    1. Takayama T, Makuuchi M, Kojiro M et al. Early hepatocellular carcinoma: pathology, imaging, and therapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2008; 15: 972–978. - PubMed
    1. Bruix J, Llovet JM. Prognostic prediction and treatment strategy in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 2002; 35: 519–524. - PubMed