Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Sep;12(5):442-446.
doi: 10.1097/COH.0000000000000396.

Addressing engagement in technology-based behavioural HIV interventions through paradata metrics

José A Bauermeister  1 , Jesse M Golinkoff, Kathryn E Muessig, Keith J Horvath, Lisa B Hightow-Weidman
Affiliations
Review

Addressing engagement in technology-based behavioural HIV interventions through paradata metrics

José A Bauermeister et al. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2017 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose of review: The goal of this review was to examine how often researchers report participants' online engagement using paradata (i.e. intervention usage metrics) when describing the outcomes of online behavioural HIV prevention and care interventions. We also highlight the utility of paradata collection and analysis in future technology-based trials.

Recent findings: We focused on studies indexed on PubMed and published between 1 January 2016 and 31 March 2017 that reported the development and testing of online behavioural interventions for HIV prevention and/or care. Of the 705 extracted citations, six met study criteria.

Summary: Only one study reported paradata reflecting participants' engagement with a technology-based intervention. Researchers should systematically collect and analyse paradata to strengthen the evidence base for technology-based interventions (do they work?), advance the use of behaviour change theory across modalities and platforms (how/why do they work?) and inform reach and scale-up efforts (for whom do they work?). Researchers may also rely on paradata to examine dose-response relationships due to user engagement, to identify replicable core components linked to behaviour change outcomes, to allocate resources judiciously and drive down development costs, and to pool these metrics for use in future meta-analyses.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest

None.

References

    1. Hightow-Weidman L, Muessig K, Bauermeister JA, Zhang C, LeGrand S. Youth, technology and HIV: Recent advances and future directions. Current HIV/AIDS Reports. 2015;12(4):500–515. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Muessig K, Nekkanti M, Bauermeister JA, Bull S, Hightow-Weidman L. A systematic review of recent smartphone, internet and web 2.0 interventions to address the HIV continuum of care. Current HIV/AIDS Reports. 2015;12(1):173–190. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Conserve DF, Jennings L, Aguilar C, Shin G, Handler L, Maman S. Systematic review of mobile health behavioural interventions to improve uptake of HIV testing for vulnerable and key populations. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 2017;23(2):347–359. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Garett R, Smith J, Young SD. A review of social media technologies across the global HIV care continuum. Current Opinion in Psychology. 2016;9:56–66. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Couper MP, Alexander GL, Zhang N, Little RJ, Maddy N, Nowak M, McClure JB, Calvi JJ, Rolnick SK, Stopponi MA, Johnson CC. Engagement and retention: Measuring breadth and depth of participant use of an online intervention. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2010;12(4):e52. This seminal study examined how paradata can be used to examine engagement, study retention, and key outcomes as part of a randomized controlled trial. - PMC - PubMed