Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jun 15;5(2):e14.
doi: 10.2196/medinform.6959.

Computerized Childbirth Monitoring Tools for Health Care Providers Managing Labor: A Scoping Review

Michael S Balikuddembe  1   2   3 , Nazarius M Tumwesigye  4 , Peter K Wakholi  5 , Thorkild Tylleskär  1
Affiliations

Computerized Childbirth Monitoring Tools for Health Care Providers Managing Labor: A Scoping Review

Michael S Balikuddembe et al. JMIR Med Inform. .

Abstract

Background: Proper monitoring of labor and childbirth prevents many pregnancy-related complications. However, monitoring is still poor in many places partly due to the usability concerns of support tools such as the partograph. In 2011, the World Health Organization (WHO) called for the development and evaluation of context-adaptable electronic health solutions to health challenges. Computerized tools have penetrated many areas of health care, but their influence in supporting health staff with childbirth seems limited.

Objective: The objective of this scoping review was to determine the scope and trends of research on computerized labor monitoring tools that could be used by health care providers in childbirth management.

Methods: We used key terms to search the Web for eligible peer-reviewed and gray literature. Eligibility criteria were a computerized labor monitoring tool for maternity service providers and dated 2006 to mid-2016. Retrieved papers were screened to eliminate ineligible papers, and consensus was reached on the papers included in the final analysis.

Results: We started with about 380,000 papers, of which 14 papers qualified for the final analysis. Most tools were at the design and implementation stages of development. Three papers addressed post-implementation evaluations of two tools. No documentation on clinical outcome studies was retrieved. The parameters targeted with the tools varied, but they included fetal heart (10 of 11 tools), labor progress (8 of 11), and maternal status (7 of 11). Most tools were designed for use in personal computers in low-resource settings and could be customized for different user needs.

Conclusions: Research on computerized labor monitoring tools is inadequate. Compared with other labor parameters, there was preponderance to fetal heart monitoring and hardly any summative evaluation of the available tools. More research, including clinical outcomes evaluation of computerized childbirth monitoring tools, is needed.

Keywords: childbirth; fetal monitoring; medical informatics applications; obstetric labor; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The steps of paper selection depicted in a PRISMA flow diagram. The number of articles included or excluded at each step is shown in brackets.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Graham W, Woodd S, Byass P, Filippi V, Gon G, Virgo S, Chou D, Hounton S, Lozano R, Pattinson R, Singh S. Diversity and divergence: the dynamic burden of poor maternal health. Lancet. 2016 Dec 29;388(10056):2164–2175. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31533-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Say L, Chou D, Gemmill A, Tunçalp Ö, Moller A, Daniels J, Gülmezoglu AM, Temmerman M, Alkema L. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2014 Jun;2(6):e323–33. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70227-X. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2214-109X(14)70227-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ollerhead E, Osrin D. Barriers to and incentives for achieving partograph use in obstetric practice in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Aug 16;14:281. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-281. https://bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2... - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Balikuddembe MS, Byamugisha JK, Sekikubo M. Impact of decision to operation interval on pregnancy outcomes among mothers who undergo emergency caesarean section at Mulago hospital. J US China Med Sci. 2011 Sep;8(9):571–5. https://www.davidpublishing.com/DownLoad/?id=4488
    1. Ogwang S, Karyabakabo Z, Rutebemberwa E. Assessment of partogram use during labour in Rujumbura Health Sub District, Rukungiri District, Uganda. Afr Health Sci. 2009 Aug 1;9(Suppl 1):S27–34. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/20589158 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources