Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan;57(1):25-32.
doi: 10.1002/mus.25723. Epub 2017 Jul 6.

Ultrasound-guided hydrodissection decreases gliding resistance of the median nerve within the carpal tunnel

Stefanie Evers  1   2   3 , Andrew R Thoreson  1 , Jay Smith  4 , Chunfeng Zhao  1 , Jennifer R Geske  5 , Peter C Amadio  1
Affiliations

Ultrasound-guided hydrodissection decreases gliding resistance of the median nerve within the carpal tunnel

Stefanie Evers et al. Muscle Nerve. 2018 Jan.

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to assess alterations in median nerve (MN) biomechanics within the carpal tunnel resulting from ultrasound-guided hydrodissection in a cadaveric model.

Methods: Twelve fresh frozen human cadaver hands were used. MN gliding resistance was measured at baseline and posthydrodissection, by pulling the nerve proximally and then returning it to the origin. Six specimens were treated with hydrodissection, and 6 were used as controls.

Results: In the hydrodissection group there was a significant reduction in mean peak gliding resistance of 92.9 ± 34.8 mN between baseline and immediately posthydrodissection (21.4% ± 10.5%; P = 0.001). No significant reduction between baseline and the second cycle occurred in the control group: 9.6 ± 29.8 mN (0.4% ± 5.3%; P = 0.467).

Discussion: Hydrodissection can decrease the gliding resistance of the MN within the carpal tunnel, at least in wrists unaffected by carpal tunnel syndrome. A clinical trial of hydrodissection seems justified. Muscle Nerve 57: 25-32, 2018.

Keywords: carpal tunnel; gliding resistance; hydrodissection; injection; nerve; ultrasound.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures: No conflicts of interest to report.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A) Median nerve and tendons in closest proximity to the median nerve exposed 2.5 cm proximal to the proximal wrist crease (arrow). Median nerve exposed distal to the carpal tunnel outlet, approximately 5cm distal to the proximal wrist crease depending on hand size. B) Three palmar digital branches (dotted arrows) and motor branch (solid arrow) of the median nerve identified. C) Branches of the median nerve sutured together: the neutral position of the nerve identified by markers at the same level of the nerve and underlying FDS3 tendon (arrow).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Experimental set up.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Flow chart describing testing sequence.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Transverse ultrasound image of the carpal tunnel. Left=ulnar. A 27-gauge needle (dotted arrow) penetrated the TCL (down pointing arrows) on the ulnar side of the carpal tunnel A) freeing the median nerve (MN) from the transverse carpal ligament B) separating the nerve from the underlying subsynovial connective tissue and flexor tendons (FT).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Difference in A) peak gliding resistance and B) energy absorption between baseline (cycle 1) and second cycle for both groups. The boxplots show the distribution of peak gliding resistance and energy absorption for the two groups. The boxes represent the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles. The whiskers show the range and points represent the data values.
Figure 6
Figure 6
A) Mean peak gliding resistance at baseline, during repetitive motion testing, post-TCL transection and post-neurolysis of the median nerve. Error bars represent standard deviations. B) Energy absorption at baseline, during repetitive motion testing, post-TCL transection and post-neurolysis of the median nerve. Error bars represent one standard deviation.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Atroshi I, Englund M, Turkiewicz A, Tagil M, Petersson IF. Incidence of physician-diagnosed carpal tunnel syndrome in the general population. Archives of internal medicine. 2011;171(10):943–944. - PubMed
    1. Roquelaure Y, Chazelle E, Gautier L, Plaine J, Descatha A, Evanoff B, et al. Time trends in incidence and prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome over eight years according to multiple data sources: Pays de la Loire study. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2016 - PubMed
    1. Gelfman R, Melton LJ, 3rd, Yawn BP, Wollan PC, Amadio PC, Stevens JC. Long-term trends in carpal tunnel syndrome. Neurology. 2009;72(1):33–41. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bland JD, Rudolfer SM. Clinical surveillance of carpal tunnel syndrome in two areas of the United Kingdom, 1991–2001. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003;74(12):1674–1679. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Huisstede BM, Hoogvliet P, Randsdorp MS, Glerum S, van Middelkoop M, Koes BW. Carpal tunnel syndrome. Part I: effectiveness of nonsurgical treatments--a systematic review. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2010;91(7):981–1004. - PubMed