Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2017 Aug;48(8):1749-1757.
doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.05.037. Epub 2017 May 29.

Biomechanical evaluation of the tension band wiring principle. A comparison between two different techniques for transverse patella fracture fixation

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Biomechanical evaluation of the tension band wiring principle. A comparison between two different techniques for transverse patella fracture fixation

Ivan Zderic et al. Injury. 2017 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the validity of the dynamic compression principle of tension band wiring in two techniques for patella fracture treatment.

Methods: Twelve human cadaveric knees with simulated transverse patella fractures were assigned to two groups for treatment with tension band wiring using either Kirschner (K-) wires or cannulated screws. Biomechanical testing was performed over three knee movement cycles between 90° flexion and 0° full extension. Pressure distribution in the fracture gap and fracture site displacement were evaluated at the 3rd cycle in 15° steps, namely 90°-75°-60°-45°-30°-15°-0° extension phase and 0°-15°-30°-45°-60°-75°-90° flexion phase.

Results: Mean anterior / posterior interfragmentary pressure in the groups with K-wires and cannulated screws ranged within 0.16-0.40MPa / 0.12-0.35MPa and 0.37-0.59MPa / 0.10-0.30MPa, respectively. These changes remained non-significant for both groups and loading phases (P≥0.171). Mean anterior / posterior fracture site displacement for K-wires and cannulated screws ranged within -0.01-0.53mm / 0.11-0.74mm and 0.11-0.55mm / -0.10-0.50mm, respectively. Anterior displacement remained without significant changes for both groups and loading phases (P≥0.112). However, posterior displacement underwent a significant increase in the course of knee extension for K-wires (P≤0.047), but not for cannulated screws (P≥0.202). Significantly smaller displacement at the posterior fracture site was detected in the group with cannulated screws compared to K-wires at 60° and 75° extension phase (P≤0.017), as well as at 45°, 60° and 75° flexion phase (P≤0.018). The critical value of 2mm displacement at the posterior fracture site was not reached for any specimen and fixation technique. Knee extension was accompanied by synchronous increase in quadriceps pulling force.

Conclusions: Tension band wiring fulfills from a biomechanical perspective the requirements for sufficient stability of transverse patella fracture fixation. It should, however, rather be considered as a static fixation principle than a dynamic one. Tension band wiring with cannulated screws was found advantageous over Kirschner wires in terms of interfragmentary movements at the posterior fracture site.

Keywords: Biomechanics; Cannulated screw; Interfragmentary pressure; Kirschner wire; Tension band wiring; Transverse patella fracture.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources