Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017:2017:7197652.
doi: 10.1155/2017/7197652. Epub 2017 May 23.

Status and Prospects of Robotic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: Our Experience and a Review of the Literature

Affiliations
Review

Status and Prospects of Robotic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: Our Experience and a Review of the Literature

Sejin Lee et al. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2017.

Abstract

Since the first report of robotic gastrectomy, experienced laparoscopic surgeons have used surgical robots to treat gastric cancer and resolve problems associated with laparoscopic gastrectomy. However, compared with laparoscopic gastrectomy, the superiority of robotic procedures has not been clearly proven. There are several advantages to using robotic surgery for gastric cancer, such as reduced estimated blood loss during the operation, a shorter learning curve, and a larger number of examined lymph nodes than conventional laparoscopic gastrectomy. The increased operation time observed with a robotic system is decreasing because surgeons have accumulated experience using this procedure. While there is limited evidence, long-term oncologic outcomes appear to be similar between robotic and laparoscopic gastrectomy. Robotic procedures have a significantly greater financial cost than laparoscopic gastrectomy, which is a major drawback. Recent clinical studies tried to demonstrate that the benefits of robotic surgery outweighed the cost, but the overall results were disappointing. Ongoing studies are investigating the benefits of robotic gastrectomy in more complicated and challenging cases. Well-designed randomized control trials with large sample sizes are needed to investigate the benefits of robotic gastrectomy compared with laparoscopic surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Huscher C. G., Mingoli A., Sgarzini G., et al. Laparoscopic versus open subtotal gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer: five-year results of a randomized prospective trial. Annals of Surgery. 2005;241(2):232–237. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000151892.35922.f2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kim Y. W., Baik Y. H., Yun Y. H., et al. Improved quality of life outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: results of a prospective randomized clinical trial. Annals of Surgery. 2008;248(5):721–727. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318185e62e. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kim H. H., Hyung W. J., Cho G. S., et al. Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an interim report—a phase III multicenter, prospective, randomized trial (KLASS trial) Annals of Surgery. 2010;251(3):417–420. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181cc8f6b. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Strong V. E. Defining the role of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2014;32(7):613–614. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.52.9479. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jiang L., Yang K. H., Guan Q. L., et al. Laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for resectable gastric cancer: an update meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials. Surgical Endoscopy. 2013;27(7):2466–2480. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2758-6. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources