Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Sep;1(5):393-400.
doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2016.04.003.

Hallucinations as top-down effects on perception

Affiliations

Hallucinations as top-down effects on perception

Albert R Powers III et al. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2016 Sep.

Abstract

The problem of whether and how information is integrated across hierarchical brain networks embodies a fundamental tension in contemporary cognitive neuroscience, and by extension, cognitive neuropsychiatry. Indeed, the penetrability of perceptual processes in a 'top-down' manner by higher-level cognition-a natural extension of hierarchical models of perception-may contradict a strictly modular view of mental organization. Furthermore, some in the cognitive science community have challenged cognitive penetration as an unlikely, if not impossible, process. We review the evidence for and against top-down influences in perception, informed by a predictive coding model of perception and drawing heavily upon the literature of computational neuroimaging. We extend these findings to propose a way in which these processes may be altered in mental illness. We propose that hallucinations - perceptions without stimulus - can be understood as top-down effects on perception, mediated by inappropriate perceptual priors.

Keywords: Connectivity; Hallucinations; Modularity; Neuroimaging; Neuropsychology; Predictive Coding; Psychosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors report no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Hubs, Connectors and Modules
Connectors (black circles) and hubs (white squares) in modules. Hubs have many within-module connections. Connectors have many between module connections

References

    1. Jenkin Z, Siegel S. Cognitive penetrability: Modularity, epistemology, and ethics. Review of Philosophy and Psychology. 2015:6.
    1. Firestone C, Scholl BJ. Cognition does not affect perception: Evaluating the evidence for ‘top-down’ effects. The Behavioral and brain sciences. 2015:1–77. - PubMed
    1. Fodor JA. The modularity of mind: an essay on faculty psychology. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 1983.
    1. Twyman AD, Newcombe NS. Five reasons to doubt the existence of a geometric module. Cogn Sci. 2010;34:1315–1356. - PubMed
    1. Coltheart M. Brain imaging, connectionism, and cognitive neuropsychology. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2004;21:21–25. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources