Sexual Violation of Patients by Physicians: A Mixed-Methods, Exploratory Analysis of 101 Cases
- PMID: 28627296
- PMCID: PMC6031470
- DOI: 10.1177/1079063217712217
Sexual Violation of Patients by Physicians: A Mixed-Methods, Exploratory Analysis of 101 Cases
Abstract
A mixed-method, exploratory design was used to examine 101 cases of sexual violations in medicine. The study involved content analysis of cases to characterize the physicians, patient-victims, the practice setting, kinds of sexual violations, and consequences to the perpetrator. In each case, a criminal law framework was used to examine how motives, means, and opportunity combined to generate sexual misconduct. Finally, cross-case analysis was performed to identify clusters of causal factors that explain specific kinds of sexual misconduct. Most cases involved a combination of five factors: male physicians (100%), older than the age of 39 (92%), who were not board certified (70%), practicing in nonacademic settings (94%) where they always examined patients alone (85%). Only three factors (suspected antisocial personality, physician board certification, and vulnerable patients) differed significantly across the different kinds of sexual abuse: personality disorders were suspected most frequently in cases of rape, physicians were more frequently board certified in cases of consensual sex with patients, and patients were more commonly vulnerable in cases of child molestation. Drawing on study findings and past research, we offer a series of recommendations to medical schools, medical boards, chaperones, patients, and the national practitioners database.
Keywords: medical ethics; medical professionalism; patient abuse; physician wrongdoing; sexual abuse.
Conflict of interest statement
References
-
- American Academy of Pediatrics. (2011). 2011 policy statement—Use of chaperones during the physical examination of the pediatric patient. Pediatrics, 127, 991-993. - PubMed
-
- American Association of Medical Colleges. (2016). Table C7: Full-time faculty-appointment status at U.S. medical schools for residents who completed specialty: Residents who completed training, 2006-2015. Retrieved from https://www.aamc.org/data/448498/c7table.html
-
- American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2016). Ethics opinion on sexual misconduct. Retrieved from http://www.acog.org/Resources-And-Publications/Committee-Opinions/Commit...
-
- American Medical Association. (2014-2015). Code of medical ethics of the American Medical Association (Section II, Definitions, Para 4). Chicago, IL: Author.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
