Effect of antibiotic stewardship on the incidence of infection and colonisation with antibiotic-resistant bacteria and Clostridium difficile infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 28629876
- DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30325-0
Effect of antibiotic stewardship on the incidence of infection and colonisation with antibiotic-resistant bacteria and Clostridium difficile infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: Antibiotic stewardship programmes have been shown to reduce antibiotic use and hospital costs. We aimed to evaluate evidence of the effect of antibiotic stewardship on the incidence of infections and colonisation with antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
Methods: For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science for studies published from Jan 1, 1960, to May 31, 2016, that analysed the effect of antibiotic stewardship programmes on the incidence of infection and colonisation with antibiotic-resistant bacteria and Clostridium difficile infections in hospital inpatients. Two authors independently assessed the eligibility of trials and extracted data. Studies involving long-term care facilities were excluded. The main outcomes were incidence ratios (IRs) of target infections and colonisation per 1000 patient-days before and after implementation of antibiotic stewardship. Meta-analyses were done with random-effect models and heterogeneity was calculated with the I2 method.
Findings: We included 32 studies in the meta-analysis, comprising 9 056 241 patient-days and 159 estimates of IRs. Antibiotic stewardship programmes reduced the incidence of infections and colonisation with multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (51% reduction; IR 0·49, 95% CI 0·35-0·68; p<0·0001), extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Gram-negative bacteria (48%; 0·52, 0·27-0·98; p=0·0428), and meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (37%; 0·63, 0·45-0·88; p=0·0065), as well as the incidence of C difficile infections (32%; 0·68, 0·53-0·88; p=0·0029). Antibiotic stewardship programmes were more effective when implemented with infection control measures (IR 0·69, 0·54-0·88; p=0·0030), especially hand-hygiene interventions (0·34, 0·21-0·54; p<0·0001), than when implemented alone. Antibiotic stewardship did not affect the IRs of vancomycin-resistant enterococci and quinolone-resistant and aminoglycoside-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Significant heterogeneity between studies was detected, which was partly explained by the type of interventions and co-resistance patterns of the target bacteria.
Interpretation: Antibiotic stewardship programmes significantly reduce the incidence of infections and colonisation with antibiotic-resistant bacteria and C difficile infections in hospital inpatients. These results provide stakeholders and policy makers with evidence for implementation of antibiotic stewardship interventions to reduce the burden of infections from antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
Funding: German Center for Infection Research.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Antibiotic stewardship hits a home run for patients.Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Sep;17(9):892-893. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30344-4. Epub 2017 Jun 16. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017. PMID: 28629875 No abstract available.
-
Hospital antimicrobial stewardship: the way forward.Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Nov;17(11):1119-1120. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30566-2. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017. PMID: 29115258 No abstract available.
-
Hospital antimicrobial stewardship: the way forward - Authors' reply.Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Nov;17(11):1120-1121. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30581-9. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017. PMID: 29115259 No abstract available.
-
Hospital antimicrobial stewardship: the way forward.Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Nov;17(11):1120. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30570-4. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017. PMID: 29115260 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical