Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jun 19;19(6):e218.
doi: 10.2196/jmir.7579.

Trust and Credibility in Web-Based Health Information: A Review and Agenda for Future Research

Affiliations

Trust and Credibility in Web-Based Health Information: A Review and Agenda for Future Research

Laura Sbaffi et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: Internet sources are becoming increasingly important in seeking health information, such that they may have a significant effect on health care decisions and outcomes. Hence, given the wide range of different sources of Web-based health information (WHI) from different organizations and individuals, it is important to understand how information seekers evaluate and select the sources that they use, and more specifically, how they assess their credibility and trustworthiness.

Objective: The aim of this study was to review empirical studies on trust and credibility in the use of WHI. The article seeks to present a profile of the research conducted on trust and credibility in WHI seeking, to identify the factors that impact judgments of trustworthiness and credibility, and to explore the role of demographic factors affecting trust formation. On this basis, it aimed to identify the gaps in current knowledge and to propose an agenda for future research.

Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted. Searches were conducted using a variety of combinations of the terms WHI, trust, credibility, and their variants in four multi-disciplinary and four health-oriented databases. Articles selected were published in English from 2000 onwards; this process generated 3827 unique records. After the application of the exclusion criteria, 73 were analyzed fully.

Results: Interest in this topic has persisted over the last 15 years, with articles being published in medicine, social science, and computer science and originating mostly from the United States and the United Kingdom. Documents in the final dataset fell into 3 categories: (1) those using trust or credibility as a dependent variable, (2) those using trust or credibility as an independent variable, and (3) studies of the demographic factors that influence the role of trust or credibility in WHI seeking. There is a consensus that website design, clear layout, interactive features, and the authority of the owner have a positive effect on trust or credibility, whereas advertising has a negative effect. With regard to content features, authority of the author, ease of use, and content have a positive effect on trust or credibility formation. Demographic factors influencing trust formation are age, gender, and perceived health status.

Conclusions: There is considerable scope for further research. This includes increased clarity of the interaction between the variables associated with health information seeking, increased consistency on the measurement of trust and credibility, a greater focus on specific WHI sources, and enhanced understanding of the impact of demographic variables on trust and credibility judgments.

Keywords: health information; information retrieval; literature review; trust; web.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Search procedure for articles on trust and credibility in Web-based health information.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Article distribution by journal area of research. This chart has been informed by the Scopus-defined journal subject areas. The overall number of titles exceeds 73 because many journals have more than one subject area.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Article distribution by journal area of country.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Publication of articles over time.

References

    1. Fox S, Duggan M. Pew Research Center. 2013. Jan 15, [2017-06-03]. Health Online 2013 http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/01/15/health-online-2013/
    1. Dutton W, Blank G. Worldinternetproject. 2013. [2017-06-03]. Cultures of the Internet: The Internet in Britain http://www.worldinternetproject.net/_files/_Published/23/820_oxis2011_re... .
    1. Fox S. Pew Research Center. 2011. May 12, [2017-06-12]. The Social Life of Health Information, 2011 http://www.pewinternet.org/2011/05/12/the-social-life-of-health-informat...
    1. Xiao N, Sharman R, Rao HR, Upadhyaya S. Factors influencing online health information search: an empirical analysis of a national cancer-related survey. Decis Support Syst. 2014;57:417–427. doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2012.10.047. - DOI
    1. Powell J, Inglis N, Ronnie J, Large S. The characteristics and motivations of online health information seekers: cross-sectional survey and qualitative interview study. J Med Internet Res. 2011 Feb;13(1):e20. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1600. http://www.jmir.org/2011/1/e20/ - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types