Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jun;19(1):29-40.

Theorizing Time in Abortion Law and Human Rights

Joanna N Erdman  1
Affiliations

Theorizing Time in Abortion Law and Human Rights

Joanna N Erdman. Health Hum Rights. 2017 Jun.

Abstract

The legal regulation of abortion by gestational age, or length of pregnancy, is a relatively undertheorized dimension of abortion and human rights. Yet struggles over time in abortion law, and its competing representations and meanings, are ultimately struggles over ethical and political values, authority and power, the very stakes that human rights on abortion engage. This article focuses on three struggles over time in abortion and human rights law: those related to morality, health, and justice. With respect to morality, the article concludes that collective faith and trust should be placed in the moral judgment of those most affected by the passage of time in pregnancy and by later abortion-pregnant women. With respect to health, abortion law as health regulation should be evidence-based to counter the stigma of later abortion, which leads to overregulation and access barriers. With respect to justice, in recognizing that there will always be a need for abortion services later in pregnancy, such services should be safe, legal, and accessible without hardship or risk. At the same time, justice must address the structural conditions of women's capacity to make timely decisions about abortion, and to access abortion services early in pregnancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Berer M. “A critical appraisal of laws on second trimester abortion”. Reproductive Health Matters. 2008;16(31):3–13. See exceptions. - PubMed
    2. Boland R. “Second trimester abortion laws globally: actuality, trends, and recommendations”. Reproductive Health Matters. 2010;18(36):67–89. - PubMed
    3. Hunter N.D. “Time limits on abortion”. In: Cohen S., Taub N., editors. Reproductive laws for the 1990s. Clifton, New Jersey: Humana Press; 1989. pp. 129–153.
    1. World Health Organization. Safe abortion: technical and policy guidance for health systems. 2nd. Geneva: WHO; 2012. p. 98. - PubMed
    1. Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, General Comment No. 22. UN Doc. No. E/C.12/GC/22. The Right to sexual and reproductive health (Article 12) 2016
    2. Erdman J.N. “The procedural turn: Abortion at the European Court of Human Rights”. In: Cook R., Erdman J.N., Dickens B., editors. Abortion law in transnational perspective: Cases and controversies. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 2014. pp. 121–142. See also.
    1. Rowan A. “Prosecuting women for self-inducing abortion: Counterproductive and lacking compassion”. Guttmacher Policy Review. 2015;18(3):70–76. pp.
    2. Pilkington E. “Indiana Women Charged with Feticide after unborn child’s death”. The Guardian. 2014 See. August 26.
    3. McDonald H. “Northern Irish women given suspended sentence over self-induced abortion”. The Guardian. 2016 April 4.
    4. Viterna J. “Conceiving While Poor, Imprisoned for Murder”. NACLA Report on the Americas. 2014;47(3):34–37. pp.
    1. Harrington J. “Time as dimension of medical law”. Medical Law Review. 2012;20:491–515. pp. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources