Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Sep;14(9):524-530.
doi: 10.1089/fpd.2017.2297. Epub 2017 Jun 20.

Changing US Population Demographics: What Does This Mean for Listeriosis Incidence and Exposure?

Affiliations

Changing US Population Demographics: What Does This Mean for Listeriosis Incidence and Exposure?

Aurelie M Pohl et al. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2017 Sep.

Abstract

Listeria monocytogenes is an important cause of foodborne illness hospitalization, fetal loss, and death in the United States. Listeriosis incidence rate varies significantly among population subgroups with pregnant women, older persons, and the Hispanic population having increased relative risks compared with the other subpopulations. Using estimated rates of listeriosis per subpopulation based on FoodNet data from 2004 to 2009, we evaluate the expected number of cases and incidence rates of listeriosis in the US population and the pregnant women subpopulation as the demographic composition changes over time with respect to ethnicity, pregnancy status, and age distribution. If the incidence rate per subpopulation is held constant, the overall US population listeriosis incidence rate would increase from 0.25 per 100,000 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.19-0.34) in 2010 to 0.28 (95% CI: 0.22-0.38) in 2020 and 0.32 (95% CI: 0.25-0.43) in 2030, because of the changes in the population structure. Similarly, the pregnancy-associated incidence rate is expected to increase from 4.0 per 100,000 pregnant women (95% CI: 2.5-6.5) in 2010 to 4.1 (95% CI: 2.6-6.7) in 2020 and 4.4 (95% CI: 2.7-7.2) in 2030 as the proportion of Hispanic pregnant women increases. We further estimate that a reduction of 12% in the exposure of the US population to L. monocytogenes would be needed to maintain a constant incidence rate from 2010 to 2020 (current trend), assuming infectivity (strain virulence distribution and individual susceptibility) is unchanged. To reduce the overall US population incidence rate by one-third (Healthy People 2020 goal) would require a reduction in exposure (or infectivity) to L. monocytogenes of 48% over the same time period. Reduction/elimination in exposure of pregnant and Hispanic subpopulations alone could not meet this target. This information may be useful in setting public health targets, developing risk management options, and in interpreting trends in the public health burden of foodborne listeriosis in the United States.

Keywords: Hispanic; Listeria monocytogenes; US population; demographics; elderly; pregnant.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No competing financial interests exist.

Figures

<b>FIG. 1.</b>
FIG. 1.
Histogram of the pregnant population demographics by ethnicity for the years 2010, 2020, and 2030 (Data: US Census Bureau).
<b>FIG. 2.</b>
FIG. 2.
Histogram of the four oldest age group population demographics by ethnicity for the years 2010, 2020, and 2030 (Data: US Census Bureau).
<b>FIG. 3.</b>
FIG. 3.
(a) Predicted incidence rate for the pregnant population expressed per 100,000 pregnant women. (b) Predicted incidence rate for the nonpregnant population (square) and the total population (triangle) expressed per 100,000 people, a lag on the x-axis was added for visibility. (c) Number of cases for the pregnant population. (d) Number of cases for the nonpregnant population (square) and the total population (triangle), a lag on the x-axis was added for visibility. Segments represent 95% bootstrap confidence intervals for each figure.

References

    1. Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 2015;67:1–48
    1. Bouwknegt M, van Pelt W, Havelaar AH. Scoping the impact of changes in population age-structure on the future burden of foodborne disease in the Netherlands, 2020–2060. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2013;10:2888–2896 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Census Bureau. 2009 national population projections (supplemental). Population Projections. 2009. Available at: http://www.census.gov/population/projections/data/national/2009.html Accessed October17, 2016
    1. Census Bureau. 2014 national population projections. Population Projections. 2014. Available at: http://www.census.gov/population/projections/data/national/2014.html Accessed October17, 2016
    1. Crim SM, Iwamoto M, Huang JY, Griffin PM, Gilliss D, Cronquist AB, Cartter M, Tobin-D'Angelo M, Blythe D, Smith K, Lathrop S, Zansky S, Cieslak PR, Dunn J, Holt KG, Lance S, Tauxe R, Henao OL. Incidence and trends of infection with pathogens transmitted commonly through food—Foodborne diseases active surveillance network, 10 us sites, 2006–2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2014;63:328–332 - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources